1 point

Lame

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Of course he did. What’s the provenance of this history?

permalink
report
reply
55 points
*

Twitter sleuths, as usual.

Here’s a video of someone scrolling his likes before it was scrubbed:

https://twitter.com/EliotHiggins/status/1717462615272632534/video/1

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

How many users were they subscribed to overall?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Don’t think he was subscribed to anyone, but the video shows following only 14 people. Probably includes Musk, Don Jr, Tucker, etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
246 points

Destroying evidence is a crime. Put the fucker in prison.

permalink
report
reply
162 points

I would assume that they retain the data and are just hiding it from public view. That way they can fulfill one of their organizational goals, trying to prevent useful or accurate information from reaching the public, but still have the ability to respond to a subpoena.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

You might be right, but trying to apply logic and reason to Musk’s behavior is always a gamble.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Also, it had to actually be evidence of a crime. Following Elon may be a bad-look association but it’s not likely related to any crimes

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

but still have the ability to respond to a subpoena

I feel like I should laugh at this, yet not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I wonder if subpoenas get the poop emoji back when they are sent to Twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

That’s a bit absurd. In what way is this evidence? Evidence of what crime?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I know it’s absurd. Even if I had proof of something illegal, I have zero authority to do anything about it. I’m just venting because I’m annoyed, and I’m sick of Musk’s constant bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

It helps establish a motive for the killer, which is very important in a court of law. Knowing why someone did something affects sentencing, for example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Are you illiterate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Wonder how many illiterate people know the word “illiterate”… 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Every social media for as long as I can remember removes the profiles of mass shooters. Youtube does it, twitter used to do it, facebook does it, etc. Do you really think the fbi wouldn’t be able to get the data because an account was removed from the platform? use your brain people

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I used to work for a company with a product for putting a legal hold on people’s accounts. It archived the data off to a safe place, with a signature so you can tell it wasn’t tampered with. By default, it kept things six months, but as soon as it ran, you’re free to delete the public copy

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You can get this info?

Someone want to say what “resist_05” is?

permalink
report
reply
33 points
*

If you have API access, just a matter of the right query for all public info. It’s how statistics analysis on Twitter are done by universities etc, at least before he made API access too expensive for them.

Resist_05 looks maybe like a disinformation amplifying account, follows dom lucre and that antisemitic warmonitors account, etc.

edit: speaking of that warmonitors account, icymi

https://reddthat.com/post/5443043

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m shocked that viewing history for individual accounts is public info!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If the account is set to public, then yes, pretty much everything available except DMs. If you have it set to private, then no, at least not from the public APIs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I was already rolling my eyes at another mislabeling of anyone who criticises Israel in any way but no… this is the real thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You know it’s bad when Elon can’t cover it up with a 💩

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This is making me wonder if he scrubbed the account not only because Elon was viewed so much, but because he had recommended that warmonitors account before deleting the post, and probably many of the others. So guilt by association as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Enough Musk Spam

!enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

Create post

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

Community stats

  • 2.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 412

    Posts

  • 7.7K

    Comments