The WhatsApp group, called ‘PM Updates’, contained Boris Johnson’s closest advisers and discussions within the group touched on key Covid policies – such as shielding the clinically vulnerable, and the Department of Health and Social Care’s plans for responding to the pandemic.

But as plans for the inquiry took shape, Martin Reynolds – Johnson’s principal private secretary at the time – set the group so that messages sent would vanish after a period of time. It means potentially key discussions that took place are unavailable as evidence.

31 points

So destruction of evidence? Obstruction of justice? Any of the typical charges for this stuff if your average Joe were to pull this kind of stunt?

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Average joe would be in trouble for just using whatsapp or email for government business. It is against the rules of any government department I ever worked with. Never mind deleting the evidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points
*
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

I can’t believe I actually have to say this.

You are not a government official, working in a professional capacity having conversations with your collegues about the job you’re doing.

Your personal discord, etc, is completely irrelevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

You’re not making any sense!?!

Edit: Can this not just be accepted in the spirit that it was intended…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

nixon had no problem though

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

We should stop end to end encryption, and also we use deleting messages in WhatsApp…

Our government

permalink
report
reply
-9 points

So a top government official was smart about digital communication? Why is this a story?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

nothing to see here! dont look at this! look over there! its the goodyear blimp!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

I see this as analogous to having a telephone conversation that isn’t recorded. I don’t really see a problem with that, other than whatever legal requirement there is to record and secure government communications. I doubt the obligation to record extends to every single discussion that takes place in the halls of government or by phone. Obviously it looks dodgy as hell though.

Another way of saying it is that I don’t think you need to record every single whatsapp message sent in government during the early Covid days to know that they completely fucked it. Their actions demonstrate they completely fucked it. Their public statements demonstrate they completely fucked it. The number of deaths in care homes, the overwhelming of the NHS, the fact that they were late late late for everything, the fact that the entire country had more or less voluntarily decided to stay indoors well before the official lockdown started, the shortage of masks and PPE, the billions of public funds given away to their friends and fraudsters – so many things show they completely fucked it. You don’t need to know every god awful thing they said or did in private to know they completely fucked it, because they so clearly and so publicly fucked it.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

other than whatever legal requirement there is to record and secure government communications.

So you do see the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

i see what youre saying but we do actually need to know exactly, thats why theres a full public enquiry to stop people making accusations that are not true, just as much as the accusations that are. Once there is a full public record, we dont need to rely on this person or that to tell us. We know that Boris went on holiday for no reason at the start and refused to answer his phone. This was not disclosed before, nor was the Chancellors restaurant scheme which killed 65k people. Its very easy in the political cycle to forget alot of this went on even if you did remember it.

Also, if you really dont care you can pretend its not happening but you are likely to be outside the big kids room when something does require your attention

permalink
report
parent
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments