“No one is looking at us or the extent of this disaster or the crimes that we are experiencing in Gaza,” he said. Still holding his microphone, he slid off his flak jacket marked with the word PRESS and unstrapped his helmet.

“These protection jackets and helmets don’t protect us,” he said, flinging the equipment to the ground. “Nothing protects journalists. … We lose our lives for no reason.”

157 points

This is heartbreaking, I don’t know what else to say. The justification that these casualties are acceptable because “Hamas is there too” is just nonsense. If that’s the case why won’t Israel let civilians cross the border into Israel to prevent their murder?

permalink
report
reply
72 points

That would humanize those whom they oppress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

I doubt Hamas was at this reporter’s house, which was singled out by Israel for an airstrike, which they then pretended to know nothing about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

You’re probably right, I’m just trying to get ahead of their typical excuse for collateral damage

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

It’s not even collateral damage is it? It’s the damage they intend to inflict, killing journalists who dare to show the world what Israel is doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Makes you wonder what they do get away with

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

Just playing devil’s advocate, maybe it was hamas who bombed the house just to get sympathy. Hamas has shown that they don’t really care much about civilian casualties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

When you bomb 4000 children and have a “odd” recurring record of journalists dying as “collateral damage” then maybe the advocacy work could be put to better use elsewhere. Nobody has sympathy for Hamas here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Nuke the whole world, hamas is on the planet. Killing all humans is the only way to be sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Shh, don’t give them ideas!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

eh, just gaza

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

They even deported some stranded Palestinian workers to Gaza. Imagine that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I wanna preface this with “Israel is clearly in the wrong for these attacks and civilians casualties are not an acceptable consequence of this conflict” but as others have already mentions: Israel not taking in Palestinians is very clearly because you can’t reliably filter out hamas from Palestinian civilians. That doesn’t make what their doing OK, it’s just the very obvious reason for them not doing what you’re suggesting. It doesn’t help that these continues attacks probably makes the civilians population more likely to want to retaliate against the government. “You make the monsters you want to fight” and a that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The denial of basic necessities for human survival and the driving of civilians southward is a coordinated push to expel the populous from the Gaza Strip. They’ve attempted back channel deals to scrub Egypt’s debt for them to take in the civilians. Their “plan” to ship the expelled around the world has been leaked. People understand this, and thus, the only logical solution is for Israel to take care of these people whose lives they are shattering. They can’t leave their land or Israeli land or they won’t get it back. Whether it’s worth dying over is largely out of the Palestinians in Gaza hands for the moment.

This can’t be made someone else’s problem, because that’s exactly what Israel wants and that should make their motivations very clear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Are you actually suggesting Israel take over Palestine and absorb the civilians populations. That’s insane. Theirs decades of hate and anguish here, Israel would need to keep the Palestinians isolated from the Israeli population for fear of retaliation and the Palestinians would live under constant observation for fear of retaliating. Israel can’t deradicalise Palestine when their a good chunk of the reason Palestinians are radicalised into hamas. The only sensible solution is egypt taking over the region and promising diplomatic responses to Israel instead of continued conflict but they don’t for the same reason: because they don’t want the radical element of hamas under their governance. In the end the only end I see is Palestinians expelling hamas or Israel wiping them out because the alternative is continued conflict forever (which i suppose is also possible, it’s been that way for years after all).

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Palestinians is very clearly because you can’t reliably filter out hamas from Palestinian civilians.

This is also a fucking BS, sure you disapprove but you can’t even put that on the table. Right now, Israel is fabricating more than ever the so called “terrorists”, that’s why they conflate the term with resistance fighter. Don’t you fucking think it is a traumatic situation?! Bombing, displacing, cut water/electricity/food …

At the very very least, it should have been a terrestrial attack, but they are so coward and reluctant to anything not jewish (last bit is in their book), that they go freestyle and free of consequence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean you can’t filter out anyone whose been radicalised from those just wanting an out. And the possible risk from mistaking it is extremely high.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

If that’s the case why won’t Israel let civilians cross the border into Israel to prevent their murder?

Whether you agree with Israeli attacks or not, obviously the answer to this is because it’s impossible to filter out Hamas terrorists, which is the main thing they’re trying to prevent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Your right, best to kill them all then. What do you agree with btw?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

He agrees with the occupiers if his history serves as enough evidence

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Your right, best to kill them all then.

Where did you get that?

What do you agree with btw?

I’m not happy with what Israel is doing. But I don’t know of a better way to get rid of Hamas either. And I’m convinced that if we want a free Palestine and a working two state solution, freeing it from Hamas has to be the first step without which no sustainable situation with Israel can ever be achieved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

So, you believe Israel can identify a Hamas terrorist remotely to bomb them, but can’t identify Hamas terrorists when they are at the border in person?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

The people IDF is targeting are Hamas leaders or “officers”, who need to communicate a lot and sometimes even show in public, so they can be tracked with enough time. Boots on the ground soldiers are a completely different problem and Israel doesn’t even have the resources to track all of them because there are so many. How is that not obvious??

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

My dude has never seen a customs office or checkpoint in his life

No its obviously because Israel doesn’t care about Palestinians lol. They wouldn’t have literally any of these issues if they hadn’t been doing like 80 years worth of state sponsored occupation and murder.

You really think the people in Gaza chose to willingly leave their former homes and land to move into a military enclave?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You are extremely naive if you think that a military checkpoint would solve this problem. Egypt was not able to stop Hamas terrorists and their supplies going back and forth through the Rafah border crossing to commit acts of terror in the Sinai peninsula for example. And that was during “business as usual”, not in a situation where potentially hundreds of thousands of people would likely have to go through.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Either they’re armed and easy to identify or they’re not at which point there’s one less person to worry about shooting Israeli soldiers while their tunnel network is dismantled. I don’t see the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Do you honestly not see the problem with letting out at the very least tens of thousands of people, possibly hundreds of thousands, and guarding them all well enough so that none of them can do any hostilities that can be done without smuggling arms out of Gaza (whether it’s sabotage, inciting violent protests to keep the IDF occupied or terrorist acts using weapons smuggled into Israel from elsewhere)?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

No, now you have two more people inspired to shoot Israeli soldiers and civilians. It’s like you don’t even understand how people’s minds actually work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Why does Israel not let people leave and use its famed intelligence services to identify who the Hamas fighters are? It is looking like the Israeli government simply prefers collective punishment or even genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

How do you know who is Hamas and who is a civilian? It’s not like Hamas honorably sticks to identifiable uniforms in this war they started

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The war has been going on since long before October.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

That’s pretty clearly not true

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

You’re right, so let’s just declare everyone in Gaza Hamas and bomb everyone. Right? Isn’t that Israel’s current policy?

Hey, why don’t we speed things up and nuke the area. Wouldn’t that be more efficient?

Killing civilian children is not an appropriate response to terrorism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

And what, according to you, is the best response Israel could make to an unending string of terrorism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If they filter through the border they can’t be armed. It’d be pretty easy to take away all their arms if no one was left to guard their tunnels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Yes, and then they hide and bide time preparing for an attack without having to cross over the border.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

it’s really obvious:

  • in a tunnel underground? terrorist

  • shooting Israeli’s? terrorist

  • not getting the fuck out of an active war zone and pretending to be a civilian? terrorist

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Should all of Ukraine abandon their land because Russia declared their land an active war zone?
If someone invades your country do you not have the right to fight back? You’re basically saying, leave or die. How does this logic not apply to the attacks of oct. 7th? Not defending said attacks, just pointing out how utterly brainless your statement is. It also sounds like approval of genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

Why would you let people who may or may not be criminals / terrorists into your country ? What do you think this is the usa southern border ?

Would you let random people come flooding into your house ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

*Racist bigot has entered the chat

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Great way to announce yourself

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

The US southern border is so scary. Migrant workers enter the US every day, it’s terrible. These people are going to ruin America by looking for better lives for themselves and their families. /s

I’ve lived very close to the US/Mexico border most of my life. There aren’t any criminals and terrorists coming to live here. It’s all just people looking for better lives. The criminals smuggle drugs and people over, but they don’t move over here too often, and even if they do, it’s just to sell drugs. There are no terrorists amongst them, idk where you got that idea.

Don’t fall for right wing propaganda about the US/Mexico border.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Drugs and slaves also come over the boarder because ots open and anyone can cross.

You say there are no criminals or terrorists bit you are factually wrong.

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/measuring-drug-seizures-southern-border-how-reuters-analyzed-data-2023-08-09/

The data encompasses seizures at southern border ports of entry, where most illicit drugs consumed in the United States, including fentanyl, are currently smuggled>

Guess Reuters is lying.

https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/investigations/2021/07/01/mexican-cartels-fuel-immigration-crisis-at-us-border/5290082001/

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/01/us/texas-shooting-suspect-manhunt.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/09/us/deportation-pennsylvania-fugitive-danelo-cavalcante.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/14/nyregion/92-year-old-woman-queens-murder.html

Stop with your fantasy and face reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
146 points

At 8:30 p.m. Thursday, after signing off from a live report on Gaza’s soaring death toll, Abu Hatab headed to his nearby home in Khan Younis where he lived with his wife, six children, brother and brother’s family, his colleagues said.

On his way, he spoke to the Palestine TV bureau chief, Rafat Tidra.

“He was so professional, as always,” Tidra said. “In that conversation, he was focused on what he was going to report the next day, how we were going to work.”

At around 9:30, an Israeli airstrike hit his house, wiping out the Abu Hatab family. No one survived. His neighbor’s houses only sustained limited damage from the blast.

So was there a Hamas base under this journalist’s private residence or something?!

permalink
report
reply
84 points

Hamas are very much like Visa, they’re “everywhere you want to be.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Sigh. I mean… it’s a good joke but yeesh

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I didn’t like making it, but I wasn’t the one to tell Israel to put on a broken record before they turned out the lights and left for the week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

The IDF also murdered 972 Magazine journalist Khalil Abu Yahia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Israel has purposefully targeted reporters for decades, often blaming their deaths on Palestinian terrorism

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

And Hamas has purposefully used civilians as human shields for decades, only to blame Israelis. It really isn’t that clear-cut.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s pretty clear that Israel have been targeting journalists, particularly when there is no other military action around the journlists they assassinate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or maybe they just live with people

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points
*

It’s easy to take an enlightened centerist approach here saying things like “both sides do awful things” and “everyone should stop”. And while to a point that this is true, there has a history of revenge repesials going back devades. But that really ignores the vast power imblance between Israel and the strip.

From basic utilities to free movement on roads to kicking Palestinians out of their homes in favor of Israeli settlers. It’s a small easy thing to relax in your chair and say everyone is wrong, but this conflict can end when Isreal stops their oppression. Not providing clean water and bombing medical infrastructure is genocide all by itself. Gaza is an open air prison where movement is restricted. It’s high minded arrogant nonsense to say Gaza should focus on their own country when Isreal is literally bombing their water wells.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Both sides do awful things. Everyone should stop.

But let’s be honest here, the area didn’t belong to the zionists for a really long time. The international community forced Palestinians off of their land and for a good 70 years Palestinians they have suffered. Zionists should not have been given the means to invade the Palestinians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

🥹😘

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

this conflict can end when Isreal stops their oppression

It can end when hamas surrenders.

Not providing clean water and bombing medical infrastructure is genocide all by itself.

It wasn’t a problem before October 7th. Maybe hamas should’ve done something about preventing such a situation, to build water purification facilities etc. Also maybe not build war infrastructure under medical infrastructure.

It’s high minded arrogant nonsense to say Gaza should focus on their own country when Isreal is literally bombing their water wells.

It’s low minded arrogant nonsense to say that Israel should not react to attacks of terrorists who vowed to not stop attacks until they destroy Israel with it’s 9 million population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Whoa israel just directly bombed his house with his whole family inside because he was press. What the fuck.

israel is saying they will kill you AND your entire family of you report on their war crimes.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

There is a word for what Israel is doing: Holocaust.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 227K

    Comments