I tend to rankle when people compare the colonialism of the last few centuries with the pre-capitalist expansion and settlement of ancient societies. It seems like there’s a lot of daylight between the English founding Jamestown and ancient Ionians founding Massalia or w/e.

But what do Hexbear’s historians think? Is it fundamentally the same social phenomenon across time or is capitalist settler-colonialism its own unique thing?

0 points

We go all the way back to stuff like Massalia, Kyrenaika, etc. we don’t really have enough information to really compare. Like we know people recorded the relationship to mother cities, sometimes military alliances between them… but economically? did Sybaris export natural resources back to the ‘metropole’ in a client relationship? did colonies conquer their land, lease it/buy it by treaty? Did the Greeks bring slaves or enslave a bunch of locals on arrival?

and on top of that, all the poleis had separate laws & customs we can only loosely affiliate with each other. so there remains possibility for any or all the possibilities to be true for any specific colony over a specific period—but we don’t really know.

my own very lukewarm opinion is that medieval italian (very complicated subject in its own right) colonies are probably what ancient efforts most resembled. and we can say those are pretty different from modern colonialism.

my even weirder addendum is that i think cultural differences between medditerrean peoples in greece-italy-anatolia (i.e. where 90% of greek ‘colonization’ happened) are very much exaggerated & scholarship overemphasizes a ‘hellenic’ influence on surrounding peoples who might’ve just ‘originally’ been much more culturally similar & amenable to living with & around greeks than greek authors’ chauvinism lets on

permalink
report
reply

Didn’t Hellenistic era Greeks have their own internal ethnic chauvanism going on though? Like Ionians didn’t like Dorians who didn’t like Magnetes or whatever?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

i don’t think they were very discrete groups with hard political affiliations, but there were regional dialects & religious groupings. the hellenistic era is actually when intra-greek differences in dialect are going away because of Koine & regionalism becomes less important under the big diadochi empires (Macedonians, Cretans, Rhodians, etc. are all just Greeks when you put them in Mesopotamia or Syria)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Very interesting. Are there any works you’d recommend that talk more about this? Besides the one @Wertheimer recommended, that is.

permalink
report
parent
reply

History

!history@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember…we’re all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don’t pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

Community stats

  • 1K

    Monthly active users

  • 898

    Posts

  • 26K

    Comments