6 points

Signal’s connection to phone numbers is annoying and unnecessary in my view.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

I agree, but I cut them some slack based on history. They started off using SMS for transport, encrypting everything in place and encrypting sent messages when the recipient also had Signal (Text Secure at the time, I think).

When they switched to using internet for encrypted messages, they kept SMS capabilities. I liked that they did that, because it let me use one app to communicate with everyone: encrypted with other Signal users, SMS with those using competing and incompatible products or just stuck on SMS.

They recently dropped SMS support, so now my contacts are fragmented and I still have to use SMS as a lowest common denominator unless I want to install multiple apps. And since I’m on Android, one of those apps is not possible to install.

Since dropping SMS, there is no reason to hang on to phone numbers, and they seem to be headed that direction.a

I understand all the reasoning. I don’t understand why nobody seems to be building nice apps using interoperable protocols and encryption. (Well, I do understand the greed, whether for money, power, or fame, I just don’t like it.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t understand why nobody seems to be building nice apps using interoperable protocols and encryption. (Well, I do understand the greed, whether for money, power, or fame, I just don’t like it.)

Just join the bunch of us using XMPP then, nothing to miss from Signal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh, I forgot about that! I had better luck getting people on to Signal, so that’s what I settled on. I’ll take a look again.

Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Android

!android@programming.dev

Create post

Android news for android developers. Everything that happens in android world.

For Android development specific topics please see /c/android_dev

The Android robot is reproduced or modified from work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License

Community stats

  • 13

    Monthly active users

  • 143

    Posts

  • 562

    Comments