The European Union is lobbying Asian countries to follow its lead on artificial intelligence in adopting new rules for tech firms that include disclosure of copyrighted and AI-generated content, according to senior officials from the EU and Asia.
The EU and its member states have dispatched officials for talks on governing the use of AI with at least 10 Asian countries including India, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and the Philippines, they said.
The bloc aims for its proposed AI Act to become a global benchmark on the booming technology the way its data protection laws have helped shape global privacy standards.
However, the effort to convince Asian governments of the need for stringent new rules is being met with a lukewarm reception, seven people close to the discussions told Reuters.
Many countries favour a “wait and see” approach or are leaning towards a more flexible regulatory regime.
The officials asked not be named as the discussions, whose extent has not been previously reported, remained confidential.
Singapore, one of Asia’s leading tech centres, prefers to see how the technology evolves before adapting local regulations, an official for the city state told Reuters. Officials from Singapore and the Philippines expressed concern that moving overly hasty regulation might stifle AI innovation.
As Reuters reported last month, Southeast Asian countries are drawing up voluntary guidelines. Japan, for its part, is leaning towards softer rules than the stringent approach championed by the EU, as it looks to the technology to boost economic growth and make it a leader in advanced chips.
Yeah, why would they do that? The EU has taken an overly restrictive horizontal approach.
From the article: “adopting new rules for tech firms that include disclosure of copyrighted and AI-generated content” “EU lawmakers in June agreed to a trailblazing set of draft rules, which would make companies such as ChatGPT operator OpenAI disclose AI-generated content, help distinguish so-called deep fake images from real ones and ensure safeguards against illegal content.”
So in pursuits of protecting artists & data which is in line with the GDPR, while reducing the amount of disinformation that these types of technologies can create.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I refer you to exhibit a, commonly known as the cookie law. This was also introduced in the pursuit of privacy but has been so badly implemented that the internet is back to its shit old days of popups and banners.
Instead of requiring browsers to allow you to set your own rules on cookies, the regulators wrote a load of civil law codified bollocks that meant I have to click ‘no’ on EVERY. SINGLE. WEBSITE.
Expecting EU lawmakers to be able to regulate something that is actually complicated like AI is pretty stupid tbh.
