In a 5-2 ruling Tuesday morning, the state’s highest court overturned a ruling by a Kankakee County judge that the law ending cash bail was unconstitutional. The end to cash bail will now go into effect across the entire state on Sept. 18, according to the Illinois Supreme Court ruling.

35 points

General Assembly had the authority to eliminate cash bail and replace it with a system in which people are detained pending trial only if they pose a threat to the public or are a flight risk.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Hopefully it’s not easy to prove someone is a flight risk so they don’t just apply that to most people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Cash bail does not work. My dad has a friend who got caught for raping kids. His bail was $2 million. The parents paid the 10% up front. The guy was put u set house arrest. He always needed to be watched. No kids anywhere near him. During the sentencing of the trial this child rapist ran off out of the country.

Also Sam Bankman-Fried.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I hope you mean your dad HAD a friend…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yea, and guess what… Now the parents are on the hook for 2M.

At least there were repercussions for running.

After cashless bail, if that guy’s judge got the right bribe, or even a sympathetic judge… he’d skip the country for free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The options are not cash bail or nothing. If someone is considered a flight risk or a danger to society, they can be held until trial. Sounds like the judge made the wrong choice in this case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you think that before this ruling, someone that could successfully bribe a judge wasn’t getting special treatment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Would someone mind explaining like I’m 5? Is this a catch and release program except for those that pose a risk to the public? Eliminating jail bonds?

permalink
report
reply
58 points

Other countries do this. Bail does not exist. If you are a risk you are held. If not you are let go until trial free of charge.

The issue is the bail system traps poor people. The Atlantic - The Dangerous Domino Effects of Not Making Bail

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*

Cash bonds unfairly affect people with lower incomes. Eliminating cash bonds makes it so people will be released unless they are a risk to the public or are a flight risk from trial. This should reduce the inequality in treatment by the justice system based on income.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

When you can pay for your freedom pending trial, it means that arrests will result in extended pre-trial incarceration disproportionately for poor people. Which further means that police can use the power of arrest - not conviction - to imprison people they find undesirable, based on specific officer biases. Pre-trial incarceration impacts the lives of poor people disproportionately, too, as they are more likely to lose employment, or lose enough work that they can’t pay rent or a car payment, lose custody of children, etc. Not to mention that Illinois has never had bail bonds, so if a judge sets bail at $1000, you have to fork over $1000. I have that money available to me; plenty of people simply do not. Depending on the charges, it’s also an incentive for poor people to plead guilty even if they know they are not, in order to get a shorter sentence or probation. Edit: And doing so means they now probably have a felony on their record, which will impact their employment opportunities and child custody for the rest of their lives.

Cash bail disproportionately punishes poorer people who have not been convicted of a crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Is this a catch and release program except for those that pose a risk to the public?

As an ELI answer: If you’re rich, you can afford infinite bail already so for the rich its already “catch and release”. So the only ones it was preventing from being the same is the poor that don’t have infinite money.

This change makes it equal to both groups now. Whether we should allow release at all and under what circumstance are different and valid questions to ask, but we shouldn’t be treating groups to different sets of rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

That’s correct. It’s just going to increase petty crime as opposed to solving any problems. The crime in this state is already bad, I can’t fathom what it’s going to be like this time next year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Why do you think it will increase petty crime?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It depends on how it’s enforced.

Where I live they ended cash bail for any non-felony offense and it’s led to repeat offenders being picked up, released and they’d offend again, where they get picked up and then released again.

It’s a complex issue, many of these people need mental health help, and putting them in jail isn’t the solution, but allowing them to continue to walk free when they’re known re-offenders isn’t helping either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m in… Uh… Not Chicago…ill say that. Crime downstate is running pretty rampant right now. There’s a lot of gang violence, and we are at a record clip for gun violence.

What kept a lot of that in check in the early 00s was the people committing the harder crimes were getting picked off by lower level stuff.

However, after being pretty intimately involved in our justice system as of late, that’s stopped. The cops just aren’t interested in dealing with the fallout of picking up people for petty / low level felonies. It both political and resources keeping them from getting involved.

The result is, unless there’s a gun involved, the cops aren’t coming.

Combine that with the few times they do get someone, and said person is immediately released, we are in trouble.

The really interesting case that’s going to happen… Trespassing. Let’s say I’m pissed and go sit on my ex’s porch. The cops pick me up for Tresspassing, I get released and go sit right back on her porch. If I’m not threatening or being violent, that’s a completely plausible situation.

In short, the people who want cashless bail have never been around criminals. For those of us that actually need protected, we are fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Someone hates the constitution

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You realize you’re arguing for imprisoning people who’ve been convicted of no crime, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Police will enforce the law because that’s what police do. Locking up poor people without a trial is a bad idea. Book them into the system, then see them at their court date. If the don’t show up, they become a fugitive. It just means these seedy bail bond companies charging huge rates will have fewer poor people to prey on. I think only the richest should have to pay bail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s great to see people that genuinely think that imprisonment without trial is the way to go. Really warms the heart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

when they know they will see that same person back on the street within a day?

The blame for that lies squarely with the judge’s decision to release them. The only factor should be whether they’re likely to be a social harm, not whether or not they happen to have money for bail, which is a completely unrelated matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why would police enforce laws when they know they will see that same person back on the street within a day?

Because they’ll eventually be convicted? Or are you asking why police will bother arresting people they don’t think will be convicted? Because the answer to that is really simple: they absolutely should not, because we’re not living in a police state (in theory, anyway).

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

L̶o̶a̶n̶ s̶h̶a̶r̶k̶s̶ Bail bondsman in shambles

permalink
report
reply
9 points

People call landlords parasites, and they are.

But the entire bonds industry is bullshit.

If someone is going to skip, they pay the 10% to a bondsman. So overtime bonds increased to 10x what they should be. Except now you don’t get anything back.

For most Americans it’s a flat fee to get out of jail.

Especially with how long cases go, not many can afford to wait a year for that money to come back after trial. Or to spend the year in jail waiting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Here’s a video of John Oliver talking about the problems with the cash bail and here’s another one talking about bail reform.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 502K

    Comments