The airline plans to purchase 41 more Boeing 737-8 Max planes


“Once bitten, twice shy,” doesn’t really apply to Africa’s biggest carrier, Ethiopian Airlines. Amid this year’s Dubai Air Show, the company has announced that it has ordered 20 planes of the Boeing 737-8 Max—the same model that killed 157 people six minutes after taking off from Ethiopia’s capital Addis Ababa in March 2019.

Five months earlier, a similar plane—the Lion Air 737 Max—crashed in Indonesia’s Java Sea, causing 189 instant fatalities. In both cases, investigators determined sensor malfunctions to be the cause.

Boeing admitted full responsibility for the malfunctions. The accidents led to the grounding of 737 Max models for two years; flights were resumed in June 2021.

Why is Ethiopian Airlines buying 737-8 Max planes?

Most airlines have since avoided purchasing the aircraft, with only 30 out of the world’s 5,000 airlines flying it. But Ethiopian Airlines thinks adding the model to its fleet makes business sense—despite travelers citing fears of flying in the 737 Max since the 2019 accident. “We have renewed our confidence in that aircraft,” CEO Mesfin Tasew told the press in Dubai. “We believe we have checked and confirmed that the design defect of that aircraft has been fully corrected by Boeing.”

Tasew also said Ethiopian Airlines would purchase 21 more 737 Max planes in the near future. It demonstrates, he added in a press release, the company’s commitment “to serve passengers with the latest technologically advanced airplanes.” The airline said in the release it is purchasing the model because it “reduces fuel use and emissions by 20%” while minimizing noise by 50% compared to the planes it will replace.” But returning to the plane hasn’t been without controversy for Ethiopian Airlines in the past, particularly among families of crash victims.

read more: https://qz.com/ethiopian-airlines-boeing-737-max-faa-fatal-accident-1851028514

31 points

I’ve met flight crew members that have no issue with flying on 737 MAX. They are senior enough that they could avoid it if they wanted.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Yea supposedly the issue was found and fixed?

At this point the risk should be similar to the risk of buying any new plane model, the risk of the unknown

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I watched a documentary about the Max 8. It is now one of if not the most highly scrutinized planes in the world; I would fly on one now. The original issue was twofold. First, a faulty sensor that was convincing the plane software the plane was close to stalling and would thus force the plane downwards which is a problem when you’re rapidly losing altitude. The new models have an extra sensor for redundancy. Second, Boeing essentially lied to the FAA about this system because they feared the system would (rightfully) lead to an extensive testing and validation phase before approval, and thus cost them time and money. So rather than do the right thing, pilots were not adequately trained on the MCAS system at all.

It’s sad to see what Boeing has become post, McDonnell Douglas merger. The MBA ratfucks got a lot of innocent people killed over their balance sheet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yep, as one former Boeing CEO lamented, “McDonnell Douglas bought Boeing with Boeing’s own money”.

Exactly right, MBA ratfucks who only gave a shit about short-term profits, not quality. Everyone in & outside the industry knew Boeing was the right pick because their engineering teens would make the hard, expensive, but correct choice most of the time vs their former competitors. Quality in their parts, products, documentation, training… How the mighty have fallen.

There’s a reason McDonnell was in very real danger of going under before Boeing was urged to buy them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

When i was a kid, a mexican restaurant chain shut down after a bunch of people got sick/died of hepatitis A in my city.

The day they reopened, it was highly publicized on the local news, and my family went there to eat… i asked my dad if he was concerned about getting sick. He stopped, looked me in the eye, and told me with the upmost confidence “i guarantee you that this will be the cleanest restaurant meal you will ever have in your life”…

i feel a similar concept applies to this situation… with all the eyes on the 737 max8, there is no way management is going to sell one if it has outstanding flaws/safety issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Similarly to your story, you don’t fire the IT person who makes a grave mistake that costs a lot of time/money/lost data, because you can be damn sure they’ll never, ever do that again.

Unless it was gross negligence and the person is just an idiot, any capable person will learn from their mistakes, and never make the big ones twice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A mechanic once told me: If its cheaper to pay the families of the dead than fix the issue, then they wont fix the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

There wasn’t even a huge issue to begin with. There was a clunky checklist and pilots didn’t get any specific training on it but I would be comfortable flying in an unmodified one with any major US or EU carrier. The planes that crashed were safely recoverable, the pilots just made ongoing mistakes for a very long time in both situations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No that isn’t the whole story. You’ve presented just a small sliver of the overall problem with the Max.

The Max uses a new type of engine which is too large to fit underneath the wing as it did with older models. To make it fit, Boeing had to mount it just forward of the wing which significantly changes the center of gravity and thrust for the plane.

This changed the flight characteristics of the plane and Boeing engineers put controls and system over-rides in place to adjust for these differences. Unfortunately the system they put in place did not have enough backups for these new flight control systems nor did they make pilots aware of the changes or the overrides for them if something went wrong. Boeing also hid these changes from the FAA because if they had known about them it would have required a much more intensive certification process for pilots to switch from older 737s to the new Max.

I have greatly simplified the story here but as with all major disasters there were a string of failures that causes this crash. At every step of the way this disaster could have been avoided but Boeing consciously made decisions that weren’t in the interests of good engineering or public safety. In the end they paid for it financially, unfortunately the major decision makers have avoided criminal culpability.

I highly recommend that anyone who is interested in this story just do a search on YouTube to educate themselves on the Boeing Max disaster. There are great documentaries on this subject that are fascinating to watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Downvoted for the stupid title. Well yeah, it’s not a lie. But it’s unnecessary to create panic around it at this point.

The tremendous amount of issues with the 737 Max and its certification process have already been identified and rectified, and the already manufactured aircraft were also fixed, and the ones responsible for the disasters are (hopefully) punished.

While I’m not a Boeing fan myself, I guess, by now it’s safe to fly.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

This one specific issue was addressed. Who knows which other compromises they had to make (and hide)…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Also, what’s the bet they’re getting a great deal on the planes in an effort to regain brand trust & loyalty?

But yeah, safety isn’t a factor now.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

“This thing was bad once, therefore it will continue to be bad forever”

permalink
report
reply
-6 points

Bro really is risking it all

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I mean, if you pay attention the issue isn’t really with the plane. It’s with Boeing adding features without notifying the FAA so they don’t have to pay to retrain pilots.

In essence, capitalism strikes again. It’ll be funny if these Ethiopians actually get a great deal because Boeing decided to fuck over countries who paid full price for these.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“If I just double down I’ll win it all back!” - Ethiopian Airlines, probably

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 283K

    Comments