For a self-hosted application with a valid SSL certificate and support for OAuth, what are the benefits that Cloudflare Access provides? From what I can tell, it also filters traffic to possibly block attacks? Can it even be used with a self-hosted app if you aren’t also running Cloudflare Tunnel? Is there a better alternative (that also integrates with major OAuth providers like Google, Github, etc) for self-hosters? Thanks for the help in understanding how this works.

1 point

Benefits have been listed out here by others. The few restrictions I found on the free tier of Cloudflare is that they limit file size for uploads to 200MB. If you were exposing your NAS and want to upload a large file then you need to pay for Cloudflare or it will be restricted.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Didn’t they changed their TOS about streaming?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Last I’d checked (a couple years ago), they don’t permit media streaming via a free account, just serving static files. (I mean… Fair.)

I had several issues with emby/plex not loading streams through cloudflare connections, or really struggling to do so. Disabling cloudflare proxying for that subdomain solved that.

Now I just have cloudflare proxying my static file server and Ombi. Emby is a direct connection and everything else is behind OpenVPN.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I can expose things like HASS and my Unifi controller to the public internet, but stick it behind Cloudflare Access (and Office 365) for protection.

I can essentially unlock my door anywhere in the country, as O365 has conditional access setup to block international logins and I’ve got MFA set up on it.

My port forwarding is only enabled for Cloudflare IP’s, as is Nginx (for extra piece of mind) and I’ve got CF client certificates installed as well.

It mitigates the need for me to configure and use a VPN (although I’ve got one of those configured as well) - which I’ve noticed can be disabled on some networks (I always had trouble using VPN’s on T-Mobile in North America when I was there in 2018)

permalink
report
reply
1 point

which I’ve noticed can be disabled on some networks

I’ve found a few networks where my normal VPN connection won’t work. Typically they just block all outgoing ports except common ones like 80,443,22,53,etc. I’ve got a few of those setup so I can try alternates. 22 usually works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Remember that cloudflare will see your traffic, Even with an ssl certificate.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Right, so I’m trying to determine if that is worse or if exposing a service without Cloudflare (and being more at risk from someone trying to break into my service because of not having the monitoring/protection Cloudflare provides) is worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you have an EC2 Amazon Compute Instance, you don’t hear people saying “Amazon can read your data”. Cloudflare is a major provider like Google or Amazon. Use Tailscale if your not convinced

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Don’t forget that Cloudflare offers no protection against traffic from within Cloudflare. There were several incidents in the past where Cloudflares services where used to break into other clients services (hijacking).

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Thank you, didn’t realise that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you have the examples of this so I can take a look? Was it ports forwarded that were opened to all cloudflare ranges, or tunnels and a backend exploit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can look online. Basically Cloudflares blocking features exclude Cloudflares own IP ranges. Someone used their own services (in their own IP range) to attack services and since the request came from a Cloudflare IP it was not blocked or filtered. Pretty embarassing if you ask me. But this is normal in the cloud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I do agree, they should use the same address space for ingress and egress. Though tunnels I would hope would be immune, but perhaps not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe try OCserv for your VPN it is using https as a fallback and never failed me.

permalink
report
reply

Self-Hosted Main

!main@selfhosted.forum

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

For Example

  • Service: Dropbox - Alternative: Nextcloud
  • Service: Google Reader - Alternative: Tiny Tiny RSS
  • Service: Blogger - Alternative: WordPress

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

Community stats

  • 14

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators