Phillip Fisher Jr. is a pastor and Republican ward leader who coordinates faith-based outreach for Philadelphia’s Moms for Liberty chapter.

He’s also a registered sex offender, due to a 2012 felony conviction for aggravated sexual abuse of a 14-year-old boy when Fisher was 25.

46 points

It’s almost like they recruit them.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

There’s an obligatory reminder that he is not a drag queen that should go here. Since conservatives keep insisting that drag queens are all (or mostly) pedophiles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Not a drag queen, but a Republican grifter, again.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Whenever they say this they are just admitting that they find sexually attractive men dressed as women.

Otherwise nobody is thinking there’s anything inherently sexual about drag. You can make it sexual, sure, only if you want to, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

That’s one conflicted man I cannot appreciate but his excuse doesn’t sound too far fetched TBH

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Can you copy paste it. I’m pay walled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We’ll never know.

Oh well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Not the person you replied to but

He repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and called his conviction “one blip” in his background. He blamed it all on a dispute about his trying to break away from the LaRouche organization, and said the 14-year-old boy and his parents were part of that group.

“It was a political situation that happened between me and Lyndon LaRouche,” Fisher said. “It was a member of his camp, his party, that made the accusation. They pushed it through. It was really a railroad job.”

In his “defense”, one picture from his time working for LaRouche included holding a poster of Obama with a Hitler mustache for some protest. By all means, I could see a group like that being crazy conspiracy theorists concocting some crazy plot to hurt him. But he was a part of that group. He’s now a part of a different crazy conspiracy group. He could maybe try a group that isn’t full of crazy conspiracy theorists. But then he might not feel at home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Good Lord. Yeah I mean, that doesn’t sound super believable. 14 year old going through with what their parents want? Nah. He fuckin diddled that kid.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Could also try a group that doesn’t have as a core uniting value the hatred and distrust of black people, you know, if you are one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Fenerty said he was unaware of Fisher’s conviction until asked about it by The Inquirer last week.

Are they not doing background checks on these idiots before hiring them?

permalink
report
reply
33 points

And spend money?

Perish the thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Only a few sentences later it’s specified that they obtained a child abuse certificate for them which came back with ‘no records exist’.

Happy to dis silly conservative groups, but it honestly looks like they did their due diligence with background checks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I saw that, but then the next paragraph says:

Fisher is listed on Pennsylvania’s “Megan’s Law” website for registered sex offenders, maintained by the Pennsylvania State Police, in a file last updated in July.

So it doesn’t seem like it would have been too difficult to find. A controversial political group claiming to “think of the children” should try really hard to make sure they aren’t employing convicted sex offenders, especially in any kind of leadership role.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Maybe it’s a certificate like mine for database administration. He’s a certified child abuser. He took some classes, and he knows how to abuse children. Like looking for the union label.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You’re talking about a group that doesn’t even read the books they want to ban.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Or the one they worship

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh snap

permalink
report
parent
reply
93 points

This person doesnt look like a drag queen.

permalink
report
reply
46 points

He doesn’t look like a mom either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Oh, he looks like a mother… Nevermind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Technically it would be a son… Nevermind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The dude running my local M4L has strong pedo vibes.

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*

Any time another dude is more interested in someone’s kids than their parents are? Alarm bells.

I get it, there are lots of well meaning men who care about kids. Unfortunately they present the same way as predators, and I err on the side of caution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Men are not the only ones who can sexually abuse children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Obviously but statistics exist and you know who MOST offenders are? Men.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s a numbers game. I have to deal with the same thing in my field- men are not allowed to provide one-on-one hygiene care (bathing, toileting, cleaning waste) for female adults with developmental and intellectual disabilities.

Since we’re talking about children instead of my field, 96% of people who sexually abuse children are male. Even factoring in that female perpetrators might be underreported, that is a stark number, so when people say they err on the side of caution, I’m sure you can see why only using female staff for this job would seem safer.

Are there perfectly healthy, nurturing men who pay the price? Of course. But not as many of them as potential sexual predators it seems.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 413K

    Comments