132 points

Realistically I imagine that having access to resurrection would have fairly dramatic consequences on how a society applies punishment. It’d probably be a crime of some sort to revive the executed, sorta equivalent to breaking someone out of jail, states might be more harsh with handing out death penalties when it is possible to undo them if new evidence is found, and the remains of the executed probably would be carefully stored and locked up to prevent unwanted revival and to have in case the state decides to bring someone back, assuming the body is needed for it.

Might also get things like a monarchy which kills off heirs to the throne after a certain age and stores them careful to revive when the current monarch dies or abdicates, to prevent scheming between them to increase their place on the line of succession or take over from the current ruler early, and to ensure they are young and healthy when they take the throne.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

I started reading Jhereg by Steven Brust, and it takes resurrection magic into account with the world building. Part of assassination involves hiding the body until the resurrection window passes. IIRC, the legal penalties for murder are also much less severe if you just kill someone, rather than make sure they’re permanently dead.

There are also “Morganti” weapons. They’re pretty much the Black Blade from Elric, so they eat souls. So not only do they make resurrection impossible, but the victim is extra dead, not even existing in an afterlife. As a result, using one is a high crime, punishable by death… by Morganti blade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

using one is a high crime, punishable by death… by Morganti blade.

Man, if I were a soul killing assassin, with knowledge that souls and the afterlife is real… Getting my soul dissolved vs going to my eternal reward … sounds like a pretty good deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Fair, I guess it depends on what the afterlife looks like in the fictional world. :P I actually didn’t get that far in the series, what with real life getting in the way, but I enjoyed it and mean to return to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Lol. It’s Morganti blades all the way down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Death row is just instant execution, and the date you would be killed is now the last day you could be revived with common means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

If a trial is ongoing during the date you’d become unrevivable or it’s considered important to extend the date for some other reason, maybe they just revive you and kill you again to reset the timer

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

maybe they just revive you and kill you again to reset the timer

The Gentle Repose industry will object…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Gotta wonder how that goes for innocent people that decide that the afterlife is cool.

Must suck for victims of cults and devil bargains that get dragged into the hells regardless of their deeds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

In the Forgotten Realms, the Kingdom of Cormyr has strict penalties against resurrecting monarchs. The penalty is death for the resurrector, and castration + exile for the former king. And the famed War Wizards of Cormyr absolutely have the capability to enforce that law.

I’m not certain (and don’t have either my notes or the novel those notes were taken from to hand), but IIRC a resurrection of someone formerly in the line of succession puts them at the end of the line, even if they were as high up as the king’s eldest son prior to death.

This naturally creates an issue if the prince dies and is resurrected while a long way from the capital, and returns to the kingdom to find the king has also died while he was gone. Who died first is going to matter greatly, but might be rather difficult to determine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Whose idea was that law? If I were the king and someone discovered resurrection, I’d say that if I die, I get resurrected and keep my kinghood. Likewise if I conquer an area and become a king after it already exists.

Does it at least not apply to cloning? That’s the only way to avoid old age as far as I know, and I can’t imagine kings would be in favor of a law that requires they grow old and die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

My d&d 3.5 druid has a contingent reincarnate last breath (to activate upon death). That (and reincarnate) are the only reviving spells that put you in a young body, beating aging

The cost is a random roll on what race your new body will be (and 500gp worth of ungents and oils)

A game I want someone to run for me is that druid and their party after decades of adventuring all set up with reincarnate, but all with a distaste for cheering the solution, going on one last adventure trying to die making the world a better place

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Here are five passages from Fire in the Blood, the 4th book of the Brimstone Angels series by Erin M Evans, which I mentioned in my earlier reply to @MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network. The quotes contain minor spoilers for the end of the eponymous book 1 of the series, and major spoilers for the content earlier in book 4. I would highly recommend both the series in general and this book in particular. This book and the two that follow if your interest is in political manoeuvring (this book on the politics of Cormyr, books 5 and 6 on the somewhat more exotic politics of the dragonborn kingdom of Tymanther). The series as a whole if you have any interest in the politics of the Nine Hells, or the interaction between a warlock and her devil patron, or what it’s like to be a tiefling in the Forgotten Realms—a race that, by the Player’s Handbook’s own admission (at least prior to WotC’s culling of so much excellent content a year or two ago) isn’t innately evil in any way, but frequently gets treated as though it is.

The quotes don’t go into cloning at all, but I don’t think that a clone would be considered the same “person” as the existing monarch, and so a clone would probably take its own separate place in the line of succession. Probably not very high, given the existing laws’ precedent of attempting to make the succession as straightforward and clear as possible, and minimising the ability of anyone to use magic to mess with that.

“Cormyr’s full of rules that don’t make sense,” Dahl said. “Commoners can’t wear more than one kind of feather in their hats, adventurers need special permission to hunt monsters, and if a king gets resurrected, they castrate him like a yearling and throw him out of the country, and his benefactor gets executed—gods only know what that’s about.”

“Did you not hear me?” Brin demanded. “You can’t bring him back.”

“I did, though!”

“No, I mean the law doesn’t allow it. A resurrected Obarskyr goes to the end of the line of succession—now I will be king before Irvel. He’s as good as dead to us.”

Karshoj,” Havilar said. “Are you listening to yourself? Maybe he won’t be king, but he does get to see his family again.” Brin had the decency to color at that.

“You’re right,” he said. He rubbed his hands over his face. “Forgive me, that was … I’m reeling a little, is all.” He watched Irvel cross the clearing. “We can’t tell him.”

“I think he ought to know.”

“He might want to,” Brin said. “Or it might upset him—you don’t resurrect nobles in Cormyr. And he’d ask where you got such magic, and I can’t imagine he’d like the answer any more than I do.”

The laws about resurrection spells were, as many laws in Cormyr, tortuous and specific, crafted in reaction to ten thousand crises no one wanted to repeat. A resurrected noble lost all of their blood rights. Except a resurrected Obarskyr lost their place in the line of succession. Except a resurrected monarch was immediately deposed, magically neutered, and exiled from Cormyr, their would-be benefactor executed as a traitor.

Nausea suddenly overtook Brin. He dropped down on the covered steps of a boarded-up house and put his head between his knees. Foril was dead. So Irvel was king. And if resurrecting the crown prince was bad, resurrecting the uncrowned king was so much worse that Brin’s guts threatened to invert at the possibility. Suddenly, Havilar’s assistance wasn’t just threatening to make Brin’s life harder—it could actually get her killed.

Irvel blinked. “I blacked out a moment. And then Havilar was there. She’d healed me. She’s a good one,” he said to Raedra. “Whatever else is happening.”

“Your memory of the moment before you blacked out,” Ganrahast repeated, “is Aubrin Crownsilver trying to heal you, and the spirit of his father reaching out? And it’s very clear in your mind?”

“Yes,” Irvel said. Then, “I must have slept a little between then and waking up. I think I dreamed of Hal and my father and a great towering castle …”

Irvel stopped. A chill ran over him. Hal was dead and Foril was dead. And beyond the darkness of death lay the kingdom of Kelemvor.

“What day did they find you?” Ganrahast asked.

“I don’t remember,” Irvel said. But it hardly mattered—he’d seen Foril there. His father was already dead. By law, the crown prince was the king in all but the most technical matters.

And the king may not be resurrected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Who died first

Naturally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Is this a “Who’s on First” joke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How powerful are the monarchs? Are they absolute monarchs or far more limited?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d hesitate to call it an absolute monarchy because they do seem somewhat constrained by law or tradition, but I’m not aware of any formal process by which either the nobles or the commoners (I don’t believe there is any Parliament) can officially exert any authority.

I believe it’s based on a mediaeval English or French monarchy.

The closest non-D&D fantasy kingdom I can think of would by Andor in Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time series, except that there is a very clear very strict line of succession instead of Andor’s nobles essentially voting on a successor.

Book 4 of Erin M. Evans’ excellent Brimstone Angels series is set in Cormyr and deals extensively with its politics, and I would highly recommend that book to anyone interested in that sort of political intrigue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

These are great world building ideas. Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You forgot revival being included in the sentence, possibly multiple times over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Imagine getting burned on the stake multiple times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This has been stored away in my gm vault for demonstrating what an evil government might mete out as punishment.

PCs walk into town and there’s a public execution happening, it’s all horrifying screams burning flesh etc, until it finally stops and a hush falls over the gathered crowd. The silence is broken when chanting, faint at first, gradually grows louder and louder until it feels like you can hear it in your mind, just when it feels intolerable a flash emanates from the stake, and the screaming begins anew.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hey now this is a nice fantasy game you can’t do that

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

ψ(`∇´)ψ

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Girl Genius explores this a bit, with resurrected nobles losing all succession claims. Of course, that’s if anyone finds out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How is the afterlife involved? It’s not much of a punishment if you send someone to heaven. And sending someone to hell early for sending someone to heaven early seems disproportionate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

On the other hand given that death is known not to end one’s existence, it suddenly feels more akin to exile, so it seems like it would be much more prevalent. Ideally you want legal punishment to either rehabilitate the offender or isolate them from the society if rehabilitation is deemed impossible. Death sentence now serves as a cheaper alternative to a life in prison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I suppose that might also depend on how afterlife is like. Like is it basically just cryo freezing without having to keep the body cold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

Nah, this totally makes sense. Revivify costs 300 gp, which is about 5 months of work for a skilled hireling (or 4 years for an unskilled one). Laws are only for the poor.

If you convert to the relative value of labor instead of the real life value of diamonds, it’s probably something like $40k to $60k to revivify someone. Seems like enough cash on hand to somehow get away with murder.

permalink
report
reply
33 points
*

Fun fact: that’s exactly how much it cost for a single day of the OJ Simpson defense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Hey, that is a fun fact!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s fucked up that you can just pull that fact out of thin air and drop it on a DnD post.

Take my upvote you sonnovabitch

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Going with the cost of living equivalent, it’s only about $15,000, which I think still does the job of pricing out the poor

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But in that case, they’d probably fine you so that they get that money instead of just letting those diamonds be destroyed.

Also, Zealot Barbarians can be Revivified for free. They’d probably want to close that loophole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah. I’m running into that problem with higher level players now. They are being held to account for burglary, kidnapping and property damage they did 8 levels ago before they were nobles with land from another king.

You can’t really imprison or execute people this powerful. The amount of force you’d need to bring to bear isn’t worth the collateral damage. You just fine them and force a public apology if they want to do business in the capital ever again. Their wealth and social standing is more important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Honestly it seems like a waste to revivify the party member post trial when they could have let the rogue fight to the death solo and revivify in the streets much sooner, or they could have revivified somebody they murdered unless that person really deserved to remain dead, but doing it at the execution is silly they’re going to have to roll initiative for all the guards again.

If anything, the DM is probably angry that they now have to freestyle regional laws about the use of revivify on death row criminals and create a brand new series of combat encounters with law enforcement, and becoming outlaws definitely has some effect on the main story arc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Seems like enough cash on hand to somehow get away with murder.

Good point. And it’s even less on discount Thursdays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Don’t forget they’ll likely have brain damage from being dead so maybe you can write that in somewhere

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

The punishment is a sentence of death. Not “being killed”. You are to be placed in the state of death for the crime. That’s why you don’t get to walk away if a lethal method fails. You can keep reviving them, but they’ll be incarcerated and killed again until it sticks. And I’ll put the rest of the party in contempt of court for attempting to subjorn lawful punishment.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

But reincarnation is canon in D&D so that would require hunting down that soul and repeatedly executing them for all eternity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s canon for elves, not so much for everybody else (unless you mean the spell). Though that sounds like some Mercy Killer thinking right there

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s some stuff about devils and how souls are recruited for the whole endless demon war thing that implies that everyone gets re-incarnated but its usually random, while elves and devils are always re-incarnated as the same race except in special circumstances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Isnt there a story of a woman who was hung who survived and had to be let go so they changed the wording to “hung till death” or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

but they were put in the state of death! for a solid 5s but it should count

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

No, It’s one sentence of death. Not infinite sentencing. You get sentenced, you die, you get revived? That means you served your sentence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I’m not really looking to get into fantasy legal dispute, but I will say that you are debating the count without even touching the core of what I said: the terms of the sentencing. Being sentenced to death is like being sent to prison. If you step in and then juke out, you can’t say “prison sentence over”.

We don’t specify term limits here because it’s typically not a place you come back from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Right, but if it was a life sentence and you died in prison, would you have to serve again if you were revived?

I guess you don’t want to debate but that was just my reasoning

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Can’t it just be that one soul must be dead? So uno reverse the Cleric.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

choose how you die

Old age.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Sure thing. You will do so in that cage over there. To the guards: He already had his last meal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Wouldn’t he starve to death before dying of old age?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nobody dies of “old age”. As you become older, it is becomes harder to survive various diseases or afflictions. But where do you draw the line? If someone was to weak and fragile to leave their bed, and died due to no longer getting any energie from food, is that dying of old age? And what if they are to fragile to leave their cage?

If one is allowed to set timespan for “execution” to “however long it takes me to die of old age”, then I argue it is also perfectly fine to take some liberty with the definition of “die of old age”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That actually worked once, for a Jester named Triboulet who did things like slap the King’s bottom and spread gossip. He chose his execution method as a joke and the King actually laughed, so he was exiled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

In earlier editions, Ghosts rapidly aged anyone they touched by draining their life force. Just saying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And now just seeing it (and failing a save) ages you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Still would.

permalink
report
parent
reply

“big ass tiddies, your honor”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

DEATH BY SNU SNU

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Okay someone go get my horse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“Not that merciful. Guards, off with his head!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

And that’s how you get your whole party executed.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

tbf, the rest of the party is probably awaiting sentencing

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Someone will have to keep a Revivify scroll up their ass to make this work

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Where did you get that, you’re not wearing any clothes!”

permalink
report
parent
reply

RPGMemes

!rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

Create post

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

Community stats

  • 2.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 23K

    Comments