Hey gais, pretty much the title. So far I was buying HDDs every few years always having a backup, had some drives fail tho. Today I was visiting a local data centre and they are using these cool but expensive high TBW enterprise TLC SSDs, (Samsung, Micron, Kioxia).

I know shiz about data preservation, if I buy one of those, do you think they are going to last longer without failing? If I lets say give them a power up once a while?

But it’s probably still way cheaper to just swap bad sector HDDs.

1 point

Right now, two cheap 20 TB HDDs in a mirror. Use ZFS for the mirror and you’ll have ultimate data immortality. As long as both drives persist.

(RAID isn’t a backup.)

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Two 20 GB drives in RAID-1 with a 3rd 20 GB drive as off-site backup will give you a pretty good level of data security.

It’s not 3-2-1, but it’s a lot better than just a single 20 GB drive. :)

permalink
report
reply
1 point

That moment when you realise they said “TV” and you’re thinking in GB. You became old today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lol, I became old a looong time ago. Back in my day, drives were measured in MB, and we liked it! shakes cane

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Where do I find 20GB drives? 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

From very old computers, lol!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

2004

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

TBW is a measure of performance/resiliency for drives being written to very frequently.

You use the word “backup” which implies infrequent writing. “Redundancy” is what we call duplication of data that is copied very frequently. Very different application. So how frequent are you making these copies?

In the 20TB range, a few offline HDD are by FAR the most economical backup solution, even in triplicate. As far as reliability, the MTBF of an offline HDD stored properly is vastly greater than the upgrade cycle. Even less of a concern with triplicated backups.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Instead of high quality expensive drives, consider more of the medium quality drives with more copies. And HDDs are much cheaper than SSDs at high capacities.

Those data centers need drives that are accessed 24/7 by many users simultaneously. They have perfect operating conditions such as temperature, don’t care as much about noise, etc. That’s not your case.

Consumers need consumer NAS drives, not enterprise drives.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

The most economic and efficient way of storing around 20 TB of data is to buy an HDD and store it on that. Your best options are probably either a Seagate Exos X20 or a Western Digital Elements. Enterprise SSDs are possible options,but far more expensive than an HDD. You especially do not want to buy an Enterprise SSD, keep it offline and power it on occasionally.

permalink
report
reply

Data Hoarder

!datahoarder@selfhosted.forum

Create post

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data – legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they’re sure it’s done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time ™ ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 913

    Posts

  • 4.6K

    Comments

Community moderators