148 points

Starts to make sense how some conspiracies come out when you get examples like this of people being blatantly ignorant of evidence right in front of their noses

permalink
report
reply
42 points

In my experience it has less to do with stuff like this where people are just not looking close enough or are mistaken and more to do with the idea of them being wrong being impossible. Conspiracies that I interact with don’t even discuss evidence. Because they can’t be wrong and there’s no way to falsify their worldview.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

A lot of it has to do with wanting to be superior. They have feelings of not having control so they tell themselves and each other that everyone else is stupid and being fooled but not them, they are the smart few, they know the truth, they are the in crowd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I have wondered if there is just a tolerance people have for feeling dumb. How much can you endure? If you can handle a lot you can continue to learn, doesn’t mean you will means you can. If you can’t handle a lot you make your life in such a way as you don’t have to feel that way. Like someone with a phobia who just always finds ways to not be around it. If I am right conspiracy theories are a coping mechanism to avoid the feeling of inadequacy.

For myself my work is willing to pay for me to go back to school part time and I admit there is a part of me afraid of feeling stupid around all those kids fresh out of high school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This, in the post truth era, evidence is only useful to educated people that are willing. For most victims, we have to de program them first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Every single discussion I have about climate ends with “yes, that’s one side of the argument, but who really knows what’s the truth”.

Motherfucker, you said something that’s false. I showed you you were wrong by a factor of several million. Where ever the exact truth lies, it’s way on the other side of the fucking moon from your standpoint.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

*every known letter of the alphabet.

The implication that there are undiscovered letters creates excitement for the reader. Who knows what is out there!

permalink
report
reply
16 points

My favorite is D2, the sequel to D

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“If the letter D is so great why isn’t there a D2”

spits out drink

permalink
report
parent
reply

math nerds delve into Greek and even Hebrew for special cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Þ,ƿ,Ȝ,Æ,ð,ſ

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Þese Æ-y aſes

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ah yes, umlauts, diareses, schwas, accent marks, thorns, doubles, and so on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Maybe it is like one of those ancient curses. Like every time someone says the undiscovered one it solves Bathla devour of souls

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Those same people do math incorrectly and shout at everyone else to do it their way.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

2+2=5

Don’t take my word for it research about it yourself there are lots of good videos on YouTube the government and science liars don’t want you to know the truth /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

2+2=5

For extrem values of 2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

For those confused

2.25+2.25=4.5 rounds to 2+2=5

2.5+2.5=5 truncates to 2+2=5

Both can crop up in programming, depending on the situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You got me there

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Remember when Terrance Howard tried to explain how 1x1=2 because bird people from Atlantis tricked us? Good times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There are four lights

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Just look at those viral math problems. I recently saw one that was something like (1+2*3)*(1*0) and most comments were arguing if it was 7 or 9

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think you mean (1+2*3)*(1*0).

Escape your asterisks, kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I mean, it doesn’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Of course, there’s also the times where we just make the research hard to do.

Like, we teach kids PEMDAS, but then don’t actually follow PEMDAS in the original textbooks that introduce it and definitely not in common math or physics texts.

Like, you’ll see 1/2√r in Feynman’s lectures being written not to represent ½*√r = √r / 2 as pemdas would suggest, but 1/(2*√r).

Similarly, the original textbooks that introduced PEMDAS, if you read them, actually followed what you might call PEJMDAS, where multiplication via juxtaposition is treated as binding tighter than explicit multiplication, so 1÷2(2+3) would be interpreted not as ½(5) but as 1 ÷ (2 * 5), but they considered that so obvious they didn’t bother to explicitly spell it out in the rules.

And now we have Facebook memes and tiktok livestreams arguing about what 1÷2(2+3) actually means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Laughs in RPN

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Also by the time you’ve learned order of operations, you’ve outgrown the ÷ operator. You would never write 1 ÷ (2 * 5), you would write it with a proper numerator and denominator like anyone outside of elementary school would.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I hate these math problems you see on social media. No one would write that way or code that way. It is ambiguous, and even if it weren’t it is still hard to figure out. I think in my entire career I have seen one single line of code that took PEMDAS to sort out, I remember that line and the programmer told me that they were exploiting a feature of the complier to get slightly faster results. He was an annoying person

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In the UK it’s (or at least was) BODMAS. Just to complicate things further.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

It has become impossible to tell if these people are trolling, stupid, or both.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Poe’s law at its finest

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Sphynx (SPHYNX) of black quartz judge my vow

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Am I blind or is there no letter i?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

There is a “y” in “my” so maybe “Sphinx” would complete the sentence?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Correct. That commenter just confused sphinx with sphynx.

Honestly I can understand why

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

yeah it’s Sphinx

Sphinx of Black Quartz, Judge My Vow

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Am I blind or is there no letter f?

Edit: Yup, I’m blind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I spelt ‘sphynx’ (sphinx) wrong, it’s saved that way in my phone for some reason and I wasn’t paying attention.

Edit: Ah, yep just saw that comment with the cats. It’s because of cats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ha. I have this saved in my phone (with the “Sphinx” spelling), too. I guess waiting for this.moment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

You most definitely do your own research.

Edit: This person was very right I was just joking jeez.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

where tf is it

edit: homie used y twice nvm

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Veldt jinx grimps waqf zho buck

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It rolls off the tongue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Sphinx.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

SPHINX!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Easily the best panagram.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Another Venture Bros. fan?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I even catch myself doing it out loud, on the rare occasion the word comes up.

Fucking brilliant show. Still need to watch the film but part of me feels like doing so is admitting it’s over, so I’m going to keep putting it off for a bit I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s a nice close to the whole thing. Plus you can then rewatch the whole thing again looking for how it subtly ties everything together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I understand that completely. I keep telling myself I’m going to rewatch the whole series, but I can’t quite bring myself to watch that final movie. Once I do, that’s it; there’s no more new VB.

permalink
report
parent
reply

No f but a ph. You need five sphinxes

Found it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Skeptic

!skeptic@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

  • Civility
  • Thoughtful discussion based on evidence and facts
  • Humor

Things we don’t like:

  • Personal attacks or disrespectful attitude
  • Wild speculation on events with no evidence
  • Low-effort comments and posts

Other communities of interest:

“A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.” -David Hume

Community stats

  • 151

    Monthly active users

  • 123

    Posts

  • 812

    Comments