Speaking at a campaign event in Iowa, Trump said it was important to scrutinize the vote in the battleground states likely to determine the general election. He singled out the biggest cities in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia.

“So the most important part of what’s coming up is to guard the vote. And you should go into Detroit and you should go into Philadelphia and you should go into some of these places, Atlanta,” Trump said in Ankeny, a suburb of Des Moines.

Trump’s comments foreshadow what is likely to be a contentious election in November 2024. Despite the failure of dozens of lawsuits filed by Trump and his allies challenging the outcome in 2020, Trump continues to claim, without evidence, that he lost to U.S. President Joe Biden due to fraud.

143 points

Trump is going to get a bunch of his followers killed.

permalink
report
reply
106 points
*

One can only hope…

Edit: I feel compelled to make it clear that I don’t want anyone to die due to political violence. However, if someone has to die I would prefer it be those who seem hell-bent on undermining the democratic process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s sad that I knew what you meant before reading your edit. Like we all know that this next election will result in violence. We can all only hope that it’s against the right people…

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Probably. But for every Trump fascist getting arrested or making a video “patrolling” a ballot box drop-off, for every fascist getting killed, those are huge news stories that will make voters reconsider if it’s even safe to vote. It’ll have a massive chilling effect on voters who aren’t obvious Trump supporters. Which is the point: fear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Pussies create fear. All trump voters are pussies, and so is trump himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Pussies are warm, deep, and can be quite resilient. Trump voters as a whole have a long way to go before I would bestow them with that honorable title.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

At least they’ll be dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Should their vote count if they voted early, but die before their vote counted?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

Yes, they should be. But it depends on the state. That’s specifically for mail-in ballots.

In California, it’s an issue of fairness to count ballots cast by people who then die before election day, Secretary of State Alex Padilla said. He said it’s just as conceivable that someone who votes early in person also dies before election day, and there is no way to identify and reject that ballot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Makes sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why not all of them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points

So, voter intimidation. They want people to be afraid to even show up.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Well, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What a funny thing to do right after a judge announces he does NOT have immunity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What a funny thing to do right after a judge announces he does NOT have immunity.

Actions speak louder than words. I’ll believe it when he actually has to face consequences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
108 points
*

To everyone who called Trump a Nazi seven years ago, I owe you all an apology for dismissing your concerns as hyperbole, because I legitimately thought this guy was saying outrageous shit just to rile up the Republican crowd and clinch the Republican nomination against all odds.

After what happened with Jan 6th, it seems Donald is hell-bent on usurping democracy and bringing about the Fourth Reich, and now I’m seriously worried that America is going to sleepwalk straight into Fascism.

2021 should have been a wake-up call.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

I appreciate that. Now take notice of all the people who know that trump is sleepwalking us into fascism but think that defending against it is stupid, barbaric and wrong. This place and Reddit are both full of people parroting the same thing that the Warsaw ghetto victims did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

oareoting

?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My guess is parroting

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

And with all you said, and the evidence we have of Trump being a fascist, people will still not vote Biden as a “symbolic act”. We may have a hellish few years coming ahead of us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A good chunk of the accounts I see posting those comments are probably bots judging by their post histories. You’d either have to be in favor of a fascist dictatorship or willfully ignorant at this point not to vote for Biden. I don’t like Biden or most of the Democrats, but Republicans have done little to nothing for Americans that are not rich. At least with Democrats there’s a sliver of a chance with future generations that we’ll get more than a shitty two party system, with Republicans now there won’t be anything but regression and fear mongering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I have talked to too many people on here, reddit, and in person to know there is a significant amount of people thinking and advocating for this. It is going to be 2016 Hilary again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Here are 5 reasons why people don’t vote. None of these are “a symbolic act”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am referring to all the individuals who are saying they won’t vote for Biden in the next election as a protest vote. People would can or have voted for him in past, or in an election. I am not talking about disenfranchised individuals but people privileged enough to throw their vote, and countery, away.

I am making the argument America will be much worst if Republicans take helm. The chances of not being able to vote again is way too high. If people really care about Palestinian people and not virtue signaling, then they will agree that Trump or any Republican would make it worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Well, Biden got the “not-Trump” vote last time but he’s shat the bed with the Israel thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He’s still got my “not-Trump” vote. I don’t particularly like him or how well he has performed, but considering the alternative? It’s no contest for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

If you think that whole ‘Israel thing’ is going to get better with a literal facist in charge - you’re a moron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do you really think a fascist like Trump will do better for the Palestinian people?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Fascism and dictatorships are not good for business. International trading partners won’t want anything to do with businesses located in the United States if this happens. A democracy provides a trustable and reassuring legal framework to ensure stability of contracts. International complaints are not going to be upheld under a Trump government.

This is why everyone knows you don’t do business with China.

Although if you have to have a dictator I suppose Donald Trump is probably the best dictator since he and his staff are regularly outwit by squirrels and things found growing under stones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

damn Poe’s law, I can’t tell if your serious and stupid or just making a joke.

as I’m sitting here, with my phone made in Chinese sweatshops

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

*you’re

when calling other people stupid, it is best to know basic grammar. Just a tip!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is why everyone knows you don’t do business with China.

Really? That must be news to the thousands of US companies who do business with China all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fascism and dictatorships are not good for business.

I don’t think that this is really true at all.

It may pose additional risks for small businesses but that’s not so for multinationals. looking to exploit populations, resources, or markets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
105 points

Sounds like he’s hoping thugs will show up and scare some people into not voting in states he’d probably have lost?

permalink
report
reply
72 points

It’s “sounds like he’s hoping” they will the same way he was “hoping” they would assault the Capitol. He told them to do it in thinly veiled language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

“Will no one rid me of this meddlesome democracy?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

He makes highly non-committal statements like a mafia godfather.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

At best. At worst, he’s advocating for violence against anyone who might vote for Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I think its more heckling poll station workers and brown people, but yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Right people make fun but this is a longer term strategy to make the poll workers quit so they can be replaced with actual fascists who will actually shred ballots of anyone who looks too Democrat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

THIS^ This is the real reason for them to flood the polling places - he who counts the votes determines the winner

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t really understand how the US voting system works. But if enough people in states he would have lost decide “Fuck it, not worth the risk of going out to vote”, even if that includes people who would have voted for him, would that benefit him? Reducing voter turnout across the board in states he’d have lost? Legit curious if that might be his goal or if that makes no sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

People who vote for Trump won’t be afraid because they know the scary people are on their side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

When fewer people vote, Republicans tend to win. They’ve even outright admitted this at times. This is why so many Republicans are in favor of enacting rules that limit voter participation. If the Republicans can prevent enough people from exercising their right to vote, then they might win. If too many legal voters cast their ballots, the Democrats will win - and that can’t be allowed!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Republicans won’t stay home out of fear. They’re the ones with the bulk of the guns anyways and seems a large body of them are itching for a manufactured reason to use them.

‘i WaS gUaRdInG tHe VoTe’

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

To this day, Trump claims that he actually won in New York and California, among other safe blue states. Fit the record, the last time NY went red was 1984 and the last time California went red was 1988.

Trump’s convinced that there was “voter fraud” that turned those states blue, when they’ve been blue for over 30 years. He thinks that, if you removed all the “voter fraud,” he really won in every state.

My guess is that he thinks voting for a Democrat is voter fraud and wants his violent mobs to make sure no “voter fraud” takes place. If he’s elected President, I fear that we’ll still have elections, but in the way Russia holds elections. “Do you want to vote for Trump or do you want to be sent to prison?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The Russian style election‽

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly. We’d still have “elections” to “prove that we’re still free,” but it would be just for show. Even if you somehow didn’t face consequences for voting against Trump, your vote would be tossed for being voter fraud. (Because all votes against Trump would be called fraudulent.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

So it’s allowed to harass people who want to vote, but not allowed to hand out water to people who are in line waiting to vote?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Well yes, because the wrong people are voting and getting water. (/s though it shouldn’t be needed).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I assume people got in trouble for handing out water, then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It was a law Georgia added after Trump lost. Part of the “election integrity” things they were doing. People can literally wait hours in line at some voting locations. If they legislated that each precinct was required to regularly give out water to those in line, then it wouldn’t have been so bad. I believe it was a bad faith change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s not that simple. Swing states have a divide between cities and rural counties. If you scare enough voters away in cities, those swing states become easier to win. It has nothing to do with the states he will lose, and everything to do with the ones he needs to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Problem here is people in cities don’t scare easily. If a rural mob of ppl comes rolling through my city policing the polls, its going to cause a huge shitshow but it won’t keep anyone from voting. Hell, it might drive turnout among some that were planning on not voting out of apathy. We city folk fight back. Trump sends his brownshirts here, they’ll get bloody noses at the very least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

4 years, no credible evidence (outside of the handful of republicans that were caught interfering with elections/ballot mail).

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 503K

    Comments