Mississippi has long had high childhood immunization rates, but a federal judge has ordered the state to allow parents to opt out on religious grounds.

For more than 40 years, Mississippi had one of the strictest school vaccination requirements in the nation, and its high childhood immunization rates have been a source of pride. But in July, the state began excusing children from vaccination if their parents cited religious objections, after a federal judge sided with a “medical freedom” group.

Today, 2,100 Mississippi schoolchildren are officially exempt from vaccination on religious grounds. Five hundred more are exempt because their health precludes vaccination. Dr. Daniel P. Edney, the state health officer, warns that if the total number of exemptions climbs above 3,000, Mississippi will once again face the risk of deadly diseases that are now just a memory.

“For the last 40 years, our main goal has been to protect those children at highest risk of measles, mumps, rubella, polio,” Dr. Edney said in an interview, “and that’s those children that have chronic illnesses that make them more vulnerable.” He called the ruling “a very bitter pill for me to swallow.”

Mississippi is not an isolated case. Buoyed by their success at overturning coronavirus mandates, medical and religious freedom groups are taking aim at a new target: childhood school vaccine mandates, long considered the foundation of the nation’s defense against infectious disease.

103 points

Ah yes, that most cherished of freedoms, the freedom to let children die of easily preventable diseases

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Up until now we’ve mostly seen diseases like measles and chicken pox but I’m expecting polio to show up soon … then the shit will hit the fan.

sigh

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It’s a shame it’s the children of the ones who fuck around who get to find out

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah.

My grandma was a nurse in the polio ward back in the day, and I had a friend (many many moons ago) who’d had polio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Even more of a shame that other people’s children are collateral damage

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Whooping cough is back. Yay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

‘Murica!

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Can we just call these people pro-pestilence instead of dignifying them with names like ‘medical freedom activist’?

I swear this sort of euphemism has become the obvious tell that they’re up to no good and still demand respect for it

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

Up there with “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea” as far as names that usually mean the opposite of what they’re claiming, huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points
*

How many children are going to die because of these very likely ‘pro-life’ activists?

permalink
report
reply
-12 points
*

Yeah but how many will it save from vaccine death or, worse, autism? I mean surely the vast number of deaths related to childhood vaccinations in the past four decades will uphold their argument.

Edit: /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

my dude desperately needs that /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah that’s on me. Oh well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Which vast number?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I read it as pretty heavy sarcasm, but there are people that dumb, so I may be wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I believe this is sarcasm, but it is hard to tell…

permalink
report
parent
reply

how many will it save from vaccine death or, worse, autism?

The number of people that are missing the obvious satire here is making me sad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Pretty sure this was sarcasm…

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

‘Medical Freedom’ Activists

Plague rats. They’re plague rats.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Can we just jail or shoot them or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Leper colony on an isolated island.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A rat king is quite analogous to the GOP

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

When someone says “I’m not against all vaccines, just the ones for COVID”, he is usually lying. In time this “skepticism” will slide into being against even the common vaccines and it can be seen now. My favorite blog Respectful Insolence had a good post about the so-called “medical freedom”:

"Health freedom” and “medical freedom” have become a rallying cry for libertarians, far right wingers, and even outright fascists. Indeed, the Republican Party has become a bastion of antivaccine and anti-public health hostility, a process that actually predates the pandemic by at least several years. “Health freedom” and “medical freedom” have always been code words for dismantling public health infrastructure, anything resembling a vaccine mandate (even in schools), and dismantling the FDA.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Same strategy as “School Choice” or “Parent’s Rights”, the first was created to suck money out of the public school infrastructure and put an end to quality free public schooling, the second to basically make children property again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, many are against only COVID because it’s gotten all the attention. But whatever leaps in logic, conspiracy theories, and blog-eurekas have them being against the COVID vaccine will apply to all the others as well. There are people in my family who don’t get their flu shot for the same reasons as the COVID one.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments