Because currently, it seems like the only thing it’s recording are downvotes. Meanwhile upvotes are completely ignored, leading to pretty much every profile I see having a negative reputation.

Also, I have a very fragile ego and my -6 reputation hurts a bit.

93 points
*

Currently :

  • “Boost” adds reputation. It’s a kind of retweet.

  • “Downvote” removes reputation

  • “Upvote” does nothing. (edit : for reputation)

This is because previously the upvote was boost, they were switched around to be similar to other fediverse systems.

Dev mentioned in another thread that the reputation system should be changed to have up/down count instead of boost/down. But they have a lot to do right now so it might not be the most pressing issue…

permalink
report
reply
53 points

Ah, okay that does make a lot of sense. Poor ernest must be getting swarmed by idiots like me asking for QOL changes. Thanks for the info.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

-6 wrt ego hits was funny. Go check out mine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yikes you’re at -51 !

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Boost should be removed entirely since it’s nonsense to boost most things. E.g. even if I liked your comment here, why would I want to “retweet” that (and retweet into what even)? I just want to tell you that I liked it… with an upvote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I think it’s like for compatability with the microblogging side of the fediverse; so when someone on Mastodon follows you they can see what you’ve been “retweeting”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Also, you can microblog with your kbin account, so boosting with it actually does something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I actually use ‘boost’ to save a thread or comment since there is not a save option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

As @HidingCat said it’s to increase compatibility with the other app. If I’m following your Kbin account from my Mastodon one, when you boost something I’ll see it pop up on my feed. I’d be in favour of keeping it but changing the label to something like “boost to fediverse” or “share with followers”, or even just “share”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“share” is obvious in what it does, and efficient in terms of using space on the website. I like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right but it’s more than that too though - because if someone is following you on mastodon, and they boost your comment - that adds to your reputation. Which makes more sense than liking stuff increasing your reputation, because people on mastodon (or other platforms) will like stuff just to tell you they like it, but boosting means they think more people should see it - which is more equivalent to an upvote than a like is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For now I use it to save things, since there is no save function.

So it could probably be replaced by that.

But I think it’s also here for compatibility with Mastodon…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“Upvote” does nothing

Not exactly - it’s technically a “favorite” button. Since I learned exactly what you typed out, I’ve been using it as a way to save posts I want to read later. However it is correct that it does nothing for reputation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It does, AFAIK affect the post ranking i.e. order of posts. So it’s got that going for it - which is nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m playing with different fediverse at the moment as well as this one. That one doesn’t do down votes. Didn’t know it at the time when I signed up. The idea is appealing. The idea is that if you disagree with a comment, then you should interact and leave your own viewpoint. An anonymous, unthoughtful down vote does nothing that leads to a discussion. In reddit I’d see something down voted to oblivion because of a name brand mentioned but no discussion as to why people disagreed.

Thus far all of the fediverse has been positive comments 90% of the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I hear what you’re saying, but as a counterpoint: when I read something really fucking stupid (like someone just trolling and posting racial slurs) the appropriate response is actually to downvote & move on without engaging. Do not feed the trolls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That actually makes sense. Legit the reddit style voting system was often just mindless dopamine button pressing where just interacting in the group vote was enough to give you yours but not really encouraging anything beyond that. Iv been sitting here kinda missing it on squabble and now im more ok without.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I used to get so annoyed seeing mindless comments being endlessly reposted (‘r/unexpectedoffice’ was one that comes to mind, there are many more) and getting hundreds of upvotes. I’m hoping the system here discourages that sort of useless nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Without downvotes, you end up with Twitter-tier garbage discourse and arguments because there’s no way for the community to vote to remove an idiot’s platform, just clap-backs and ratios.

The up/downvote system is far from perfect, but I’d really rather not lose it as the fediverse draws more people in. I would much rather have my opinion hidden on occasion because I pissed off a wasp hive than have the content I consume be filled with toxic bait that can only be hidden if a moderator gets involved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thank you so much. I was not understanding what boost was, and have therefore been ignoring it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t like this, I feel like upvotes should add to reputation, not boosts. But that’s just my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s also the opinion of the devs. The fact that it’s boosts and not upvotes is a bug, they’ll get to fixing it, it’s just not top priority right at the moment (since “reputation” doesn’t actually do anything and is just a small number tucked away on your profile).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But they have a lot to do right now so it might not be the most pressing issue…

Actually I think this one is pretty high priority. People don’t like seeing negative numbers next to their names. If there is ONE thing that can drive former redditors en masse off a platform, it is an impossibility to accrue karma because the system is (quite literally) broken (as in, it’s incorrectly implemented).

There’s one argument that we don’t want anyone who could be driven away by such a thing as negative karma score, but…I disagree. More users & more content is a good thing. More serotonin for contributing more content is a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@albatros

@TooL

Oh that’s incredibly stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That’s just the current state of the software, not the intended state of the software. There’s a bug right now, reputation’s not supposed to be calculated that way. It’ll get fixed, there’s just rather a lot of higher-priority stuff in flight at the moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just keeping things spinning at this point is taking up most of Ernest’s time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

It’s like talking to the police: the more you talk, the more you incriminate yourself. Never talk to the police.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Well i’m screwed then… Cause i’m the worst kind of ex redditor. After like 10 years on that site I had maybe 2k post karma… 150k comment karma lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A modification of this is used when giving a deposition. You want to answer the question without giving any more information than necessary. If they ask about time you say it was after 9 in the morning. You don’t say it was 9:15 because you’d just gotten your coffee and had checked your watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I learned this during audits – Always try to say the Minimum Correct Thing. Be honest, be precise with your language, and only answer questions that are asked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think I broke the system then

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

From what I understand, currently it works like this: boost = +1, downvote = -1, and upvotes do not feed into reputation.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

And a boost is… what exactly? I feel like that system is going to lead to pretty much everyone being close to 0 or negative. Especially if downvotes federate between instances, as I don’t believe boost is even an option for lemmy instances is it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

@TooL

Upvote = I like this thread/post
Boost = everyone following me, here is a thing I think you should see

-ish. That’s my understanding at the moment anyway

@skepickle

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

@JollyRoberts So it’s the equivalent of a retweet

@skepickle @TooL

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I guess I didn’t know there was a following mechanism here. Good to know, thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I don’t know, I will boost your comment and see what happens… I hope it doesn’t open a webcam discussion where we see each others, that would be awkward.

Edit: what is this madness? I see a +1 but with no way to remove it! It’s forever. Be cautious!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Clicking on “boost” again should remove the boost. At least that works for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The funniest part is my reputation actually went down to -7 now so… I have no idea if boosting it even did anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Even boosting your own comments seems to increase your reputation

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
2 points
*

Yeah, currently nothing stops a person from flooding self-boosted low-effort posts to rapidly raise their (apparent) reputation.

A single user can counter that 1-for-1 by downvoting every instance of it happening, but as “reduces” are visible the system gamer can retaliate in kind.

Two users (or one with two burner e-mails) in fact working together can currently destroy any user’s points quite quickly beyond their ability to counter with self-boosts even if they wanted to.

Irrelevant, as reputation doesn’t seem to do anything and we all know the system currently is flawed, but one feels we should not be able to affect our own, nor that of other users past a certain amount.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Unexpected Kbin W

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes. In Facebook you could always upvote yourself. I used to always do it when putting the word out about volunteer opportunities where I worked. Not sure if it truly helped but it felt good when the post began with a +2. Not sure if that’s something that still can happen there. I’ve not used FB for much in the past 6 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My reputation is 25 but I don’t really know why.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Seems like you posted or commented something that got boosted/“retweeted” at least 25 times then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good question. I’m -6, too (and should be positive).

Maybe it’s hardcoded? 😁

permalink
report
reply

/kbin meta

!kbinMeta@kbin.social

Create post

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators