no this makes perfect sense. see MLs have to agree and have hegemony of thought. Otherwise their whole plans fall apart. They can’t disagree with each other. So they literally can’t conceptualize dissent and internal critique as being positive. They are ideologues whose whole plan doesn’t work if thye all don’t have the same belifs. This would look like a war to them bc their ideal is everyone following the party line 100% of the time. And its a sign of failure if that doesn’t happen.
Have they never seen us have a struggle session? Lmao
The only way a political movement can work is by making sure that literally no one agrees on what needs to be done.
Obviously.
Okay but that was quite literally the bolsheviks. Not a single member of the bolshevik leadership agreed on literally anything before Lenin died
And don’t forget the part where they mount vicious struggle sessions to sacrifice anyone who is violating the hegemony in any way in order to terrify the remaining cultists into never straying from the program.
I hope they post about this post about their post about hexbear’s post about their post. Then a real discussion can start.
Why are you continuing to engage with these people?
to all of this
My favorite and least favorite habit of liberals on the internet is when they take out their pipe and pith helmet and begin to wax philisophical on the nature of the tankie brainpan
But yeah, not sure what else to expect from them, very