124 points

What the heck…? My CPU is none of their business.

permalink
report
reply
76 points

Google chooses codecs based on what it guesses your hardware will decode. (iPhones get HEVC, Android gets VP9, etc) They just didn’t put much thought into arm based home devices outside of a specific few like the shield.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Why wouldn’t it be my browser asking for the codecs it prefers instead of the website trying to guess my computer’s hardware ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lots of hardware lies about its useful capabilities.

Can you run 4k? Of course. But can you run more than 4 frames a second?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

My by now rather ancient rk3399 board can hardware-decode both at 4k 60Hz. Which has nothing to do with the fact that it’s aarch64, but that Rockchip included a beast of a VPU (it was originally designed for set-top boxes).

How about, dunno, asking the browser what kind of media it would prefer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

If you use any Google service, everything of yours is their business. You are their product, voluntarily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Look how cute. He’s still kicking

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

By using their services, you pretty much agree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points
*

this prolly wasnt a bad decision early on… why push something to a population who cant utilize it… but shit changes fast, google.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

It seems somewhat damning that Google’s own browser had a workaround for this, though

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

was it ignorance or malicious intent?

if it was a person, i would try and assume ignorance… im not sure google the company deserves such respect

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Or it’s a company so fuckoff huge that one department (Chrome on Android) couldn’t get a bug report escalated in another department (YouTube). Eventually they just put in a UA workaround while the bug rots in a backlog somewhere. Common enterprise bullshit.

Or the Chrome on Android team didn’t even bother reporting the issue to YouTube and just threw in a cheap workaround. Also common enterprise bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

The weirder thing is Firefox on ARM being detected as a HiSense TV. I did a cursory search to see if HiSense ever used Firefox OS on the TV and it doesn’t seem like it. Panasonic seemed to be the only manufacturer using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Could be that the developers for the HiSense TV just copy-pasted whatever UA into their browser codebase and called it a day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

YouTube is having a lot of totally not anticompetitive “bugs” in these past couple of weeks

permalink
report
reply
28 points
*

UA sniffing again? What was it with feature detection and whatnot?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Does this include Apple Silicon Macs? That would be a bold move.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

This issue was detected when running Firefox on Linux on Apple silicon. Firefox on Mac just identifies as x64.

It’s probably not on purpose by YouTube. It’s stupid they put restrictions on some heuristics to begin with but maybe because otherwise people would think YouTube is not loading properly while it’s the software decoding on the not capable arm PC that can’t handle the resolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Nope, my work Mac has 1080p\4K playback no problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 555K

    Comments