Federal revenues in November rose $23 billion to $275 billion, a 9% increase from a year earlier.

Outlays jumped $88 billion to $589 billion, 18% higher than a year earlier. Interest payments on U.S. government debt accounted for $25 billion of the increase.

The outlay for interest on the debt in November, at $80 billion, surpassed the $66 billion outlay for national defense, which was up $8 billion from a year earlier. The outlay for the government-run Medicare health insurance program also rose by $8 billion, to $93 billion, while the outlay for the government-run Medicaid program for the poor and disabled climbed $2 billion to $50 billion.

TFW your interest payments approach medicare spending

The weighted average interest rate on the $26 trillion of outstanding Treasury securities rose to 3.10% last month from 2.22% in November of last year.

Seems nice in sense, if fed won’t drop interest rates in the next year, libertarian bugbear about deficits will come closer to fruition

10 points
*

Supposedly there’s gonna be three cuts to the interest rates in 2024 https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/13/fed-interest-rate-decision-december-2023.html

permalink
report
reply
5 points

its not a problem for now, but paying 1 trillion in debt service and having 1.7 trillion deficit is already problematic.

if there is new oil shock however( 🙏 ), they’ll remain that high, and the average rate will rise further, that would be a deep shit creek.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Sorry this is just neoliberal nonsense. The Federal Reserves creates money out of thin air, it will never not be able to service its debt.

Deficit simply means the money that the government has spent out and hasn’t collected back in taxes yet. Which is good because you want the money to stay in circulation to stimulate the economy. The Clinton administration had a record budget surplus (government taxes more money than they spend, meaning less money in circulation) in the 1990s which then what paved the way towards recession.

The problem with the US is how much of those deficit is spent disproportionately into the rich people’s hands (military industrial complex, interest payments to bondholders etc.) rather than investing into the real sector of the economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Fmr. Fed. Chm. Alan Greenspan: The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that.

If we paid off the deficit then there would be no dollars left*, because every dollar was created out of thin air by the government.

*Except for the dollars created by private banks, but those dollars are cancelled 1:1 by the loan debts they were created for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re wrong overall but right currently. The reserve can poof magic money into existence because of US dollar hegemony but that’s not guaranteed forever. Other nations couldn’t operate like the US currently does. It’s why modern monetary theory is a joke the second you look internationally. It only operates in a closed, autarkic system

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

If they’re worried about the deficit they should make the people with all of the money give some of it up.

Instead they’re, once again, changing it so the people with all the money get to keep it and they continue to struggle how to get a bunch of money from people who don’t have any.

The solution is right there if anybody wants to solve it, it’s just their entire lives revolve around not doing that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Can’t wait for all the “WOW ECONOMY SO GOOD” wonks to completely ignore this indicator

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Because it was right’s bugbear for so long to slash public spending over, but, like, you can’t do mmt at 5 % interest rate. Not that average person should care about it tbh, economy could be good with same indicators, if it were not for rent and inflation

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Money printer go brrr for rich people, who safely park their capital in high-yield Treasury notes before the market collapses.

The point of these high interest rates is to incentivize capitalists to pull out of the real economy, which shrinks jobs, which disciplines labor.

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

There is nothing wrong with high budget deficit (neoliberal austerity myth needs to die). In fact, it’s the trickling down of the high interest payments that has been keeping the US economy from going into recession over the past 1.5 years.

Remember when all the right wing economists predicted a recession and hard landing? Lol this just shows you how completely out of touch the neoclassical economics is with reality.

The real problem is that the high interest rate is disproportionately enriching the wealthy (the top 1%) while burdening lower classes (who are struck with higher interests for their debt payment). This is how the wealth flows from the bottom 99% to the top 1%.

The US economy is now in a quandary. I have been saying for a long time that as long as the interest rates is high, there will be no recession in the US. BUT, when it starts lowering the interest rates, that’s when recession will come.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Fundamentally its sucking parked money from stock market and overseas into t-bills (why would you buy p/e 25 stock, when treasuries have p/e 20), but for that you need free money. They have not managed to suck stock market money, they’ve managed to suck overseas money though, usa stock market continues to ignore everything and hope for relief.

But free money are not limitless in the world, and the longer this goes the less buyers they will find Like 1 or 2 trillion is fine, 5 trillion a year would be unbearable for the world i think

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

The US literally doubled the amount of dollars during Covid to keep the economy afloat, and the same during Obama’s years to bail out the failing banks:

Free money is indeed limited to the extent of the availability of labor, resources and technology. The problem is how those money were spent (mostly goes to the rich people instead of investing in public infrastructures and the real sector), not how much they were spent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yes, but also willingness of overseas banks to buy t-bills. If usa were not empire, internal market for treasuries is huge but not limitless - on par with total stock market and bond market of round 100 trillion.

If buyers suddenly can’t absorb new treasury bills, for lib economics that’s a huge problem. Yes, fed can accumulate them on their spreadsheet for a while, until people outside of the usa think its fine. Than, if they change their minds it will suddenly be very not fine

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Ancaps unironically think that this will be solved by having porky directly replace the government in its entirety and that porky will not just continue this shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

they’ve managed to suck overseas money

That’s interesting. Capital control now plz.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Good thing we’re once again blowing a massive hole in it by getting rid of inheritance taxes.

Billionaires children will become billionaires ant birth and never even have to pay a shatlre of their unearned millions. They’ll just get more money than most people have in a lifetime and then hoard it for their entire lives.

Really hard to take concerns about the deffecit seriously when the people bitching about it also all agree rich people don’t have to pay taxes.

permalink
report
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.9K

    Posts

  • 139K

    Comments