82 points

I don’t know, its missing putting your sample in a big grey machine and then getting a number from the big grey machine.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Don’t forget putting your samples in the incubator and waiting overnight for cells to grow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Aren’t these things the other 5% of biochemistry?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Or not to grow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

thats more microbiology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Protein expression falls under biochemistry, and you need to grow cells for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

One of the jobs AI is going to replace

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*

They already make machines to do repetitive pipetting, it’s just that humans are cheaper and more widely usable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I am meaning more than just the piping as AI is starting to observe now too. Read here the other day that an AI is researching new materials unassisted in a lab.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re lucky if people in the physical sciences know how to restart their computer. Sure, they’re experts in their fields, but actively avoid learning new technology unless someone twists their arm.

The fields that could benefit from robots the most are the least equipped in terms of money and requisite tech knowledge to use a robot. Instead, you’re likely to see them used in for-profit labs and those aren’t the ones that tend to do novel research. Well-funded biotech and pharmaceutical companies are likely to have robots, but many of those don’t want to do discovery-stage research. They tend to buy discoveries from public university labs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Our lab’s auto pipetter is broken about 60% of the time, most days we just shut it off and reroute specimens to the workbenches to do it by hand because it’s faster than attempting to fix it or call customer service. Maybe once the good-for-nothing customer service repair phone line is replaced by AI it will actually function and be worth the half a million dollars we spent on this stupid machine, lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

95% of all science work lets be real here

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I’d’ve thought that’s typing on a laptop

permalink
report
parent
reply

Don’t they have tools to do 100 at once, and machines to do 10,000 at once?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Yeah there are robots, but they tend to be $500,000+ and many scientists in this field are tech luddites who are allergic to learning how to program a robot.

A postdoc will do the same work for (probably) less than 1/10 of the price AND do free overtime. Better yet, you can sometimes get students to do this work for free/nearly free.

That’s also assuming they are able to get funding to cover any of these costs.

As for using a multipipetter, it just depends on the experiment and you can do ~10 at once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also too there is a lot of prep to get those thousands at once. Maybe 10x the work rather than 1000x but if your doing basic research your looking at effects small scale. ramp up happens when results are promising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, but those are for scaled up processes. If you’re doing basic research, most of the time you’ll want to do it yourself. Plus, those bots are very expensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

i majored in pipetting 💀

permalink
report
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 83K

    Comments