43

All-Male Texas City Council Debates Whether Barring Abortion-Havers From Using Their Roads Would Hurt Businesses(www.wonkette.com)

posted 9 months ago

by

tardigrada@beehaw.org

in

usnews@beehaw.org

4 commentshide report

Sort:

Hot Top Controversial New Old

[ - ]

TheFriendlyArtificer@beehaw.org

25 points

9 months ago

Find yourself a partner who cares as much about your genitals as Evangelicals and you’ll never be lonely.

report

reply

[ - ]

Stillhart@lemm.ee

3 points

9 months ago

*

Next question: how much are those new fangled abortion-haver-traffic-cameras going to cost? We done spent all our money on the snake oil!

report

reply

[ - ]

atomicfox@lemm.ee

1 point

9 months ago

Is discussing the impact on businesses a bad thing? It’s something that any good city council would discuss when considering new legislation.

report

reply

[ - ]

1 point

9 months ago

I take issue with the fact that “abortion-havers” is considered a category of people who deserve distinct legal status/identification. How they got so far down that path as to discuss impact on businesses is sad. But I agree, that they are discussing what impact the legislation is logical… It’s just… “Abortion-havers”? How degrading.

report

reply

U.S. News

!usnews@beehaw.org

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what’s functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

480
Monthly active users
900
Posts
3.7K
Comments

Community moderators