Fabrizio is referring to this story by James Ducker

Would be nervous as hell spending that much money on any 30 year old.

I’m still very much 50/50 between Hojlund and Kane. They are both a gamble in different ways. Kane because of his age and cost, Hojlund because of his inexperience. However I do think Kane is still the best bet, even if he costs a lot of money he is the perfect missing piece to complete this team and mean we can actually compete now. Getting Hojlund means, although he is the better long term option, it does mean we’ll have to wait a few years before being able to compete for a title again.