-7 points

Sensationalized article doesn’t mention at all that you’re going to be paying that when you purchase in the first place.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Yeah, it’s kind of like those places that make you place a quarter in the shopping cart to use it, but it’s more annoying since you aren’t typically drinking at the store where you can return it. I get that it’s to encourage recycling, but what’s wrong with me throwing them in the recycling bin for regular street collection? In that case it’s still being recycled but I’m losing out on the fee for every single bottle/can which adds up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Recyling can have multiple meanings. e.g in germany most bottles are meant to be used multiple times. e.g plastic bottles are refilled up to 20 times. throwing stuff in the recycling bin is only for things that are meant to be melted down and recast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s not recycling, that’s reusing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s a local news site that just states the facts. California citizens already are aware they pay for it at the counter.

Nothing about this is sensationalized

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Isn’t that how all container redemption programs are run?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Make a free refill program instead ;)

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Enjoy your .05

permalink
report
reply
22 points

It’s a quarter for boxed wine!! Really though, this title is misleading. It should say “California Redemption Value deposit charge to be added to liquor and juice containers starting in January.”

They add it to the price of the product at checkout, it’s a “deposit” that you are able to get back if you want to save up your containers and drive them to the recycling center.

I see this mostly benefiting people who make a few dollars a day digging through public (and not so public) trash receptacles looking for things with CRV to turn in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It pisses me off that we have to pay any fee at all when we aren’t the ones who choose a product’s packaging.

Companies should be paying the whole thing … including recycling costs. Then maybe they’d start packaging responsibly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

For things that can’t be recycled, I would agree. But if it can be, then it still needs to be brought to a recycling facility to make that happen. Without this incentive, a lot more of it will end up in landfills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Glass and metal are pretty reusable 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Wow. This has been a thing in Canada for as long as I can remember. And I am, for Lemmy, damn near antediluvian.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Shh, they’re trying to catch up

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Not all across Canada. Different provinces = different rules … ie: Manitoba has zero recycling for wine and liquor bottles (except for blue bin recycling).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, til!

That’s wild, I wonder why not/if it’s a conservative thing somehow?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You’re confusing Canadian politics with USA

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The NDP has won most provincial elections in Manitoba for the last 50 years, I would be surprised if the conservatives were able to block it here but not elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just another reason to never live in Winnipeg

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Glass bottles have a list of states where you can return them for a deposit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Shout-out to thimbleweed park

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

We’ve had it in California for forever as well (hello fellow old person!) but it was only for aluminum soda/beer/sparkling water cans, plastic soda bottles and glass beer bottles. This measure is adding wine bottles, pouches and boxes, liquor bottles and juice jugs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Knowing you’re a fellow old makes your username that much better, I now love it.

Thanks for the clarification, that makes sense. I’m unsure how long we’ve been able to recycle those here. I’d assume for always but be not entirely surprised were that not the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In Canada, if it’s ‘ready to drink’ you can get the deposit back. So no coffee creamers or concentrated stock for example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Challenge accepted.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 495K

    Comments