51 points

What an shitty article. It is looking on the revenue, ceo income and market share of only 2 years and trys to make a point.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Lunduke is such a contrarian. He cannot help himself from trying to argue that he understands better than common opinion, whether or not his position makes sense.

This is the man who disabled HTTPS on his site because he felt that the fact certificates can expire and domains can change hands made it not secure enough… and that using plain HTTP was somehow a more pragmatic security approach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

It’s this fucking lunduke again, he is a right-wing that tries to call Mozilla for whatever reason from time to time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think Mozilla the company needs to be rethought

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Yeah, that’s been the case for like 10 years now.

The focus should be on securing independent funding. This means paid services or increased independent donations. Some ideas:

  • Mozilla VPN - essentially a wrapper over Mullvad, but the landing page doesn’t give a good reason to choose it over Mullvad (e.g. container tabs); choosing a server per site should be front and center
  • email - I know they tried at some point, but they really should integrate with something like ProtonMail (e.g. FF-specific TLD with service through ProtonMail)
  • password manager - they have their own solution, but it’s FF-only; perhaps have a cobranded Bitwarden that integrates with other Mozilla products cleanly
  • ad blocker - Mozilla should work with major websites to drop ads and let the user choose between privacy-respecting ads (served by Mozilla based on local browsing history) or anonymous payment (Mozilla would host something like GNU Taler, which you’d load through a method of your choosing)

The last I think could be truly disruptive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Honestly Mozilla could be a hugely profitable company. There is clearly a market for privacy and freedom tech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yup, and they have both a for profit and nonprofit part of the org, so it’s totally doable. They just need competent leadership who legitimately care about being independent of search money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

We, the community, really need to make a separate browser project. It’s clear that Mozilla doesn’t care about competing with chrome/chromium. They just want to be in the market to get that sweet google money so that google can’t be sued for being a monopoly by funding a “competitor”.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

They spun off the Servo browser project if you want to work on that.

That said browsers are as complex as kernels now a days, it’s crazy how much work is involved in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If I were a programmer, maybe. They got my financial support on The Linux Foundation. Feel free to donate :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Dammit, and Firefox is the only browser not jumping on the embedding drm bandwagon…

permalink
report
reply
24 points

This article is chudposting, remember that

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Firefox slides into irrelevance either. I didn’t realize it has less than 4% market share. I remember when it had around 20% not too long ago

permalink
report
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 926

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments

Community moderators