It’s Mickey, but not as you’ve ever seen him before.

A trailer for a slasher film, featuring a masked killer dressed as Mickey Mouse, was released on 1 January, the day that Disney’s copyright on the earliest versions of the cartoon character expired in the US.

“We wanted the polar opposite of what exists,” the movie’s producer said.

A new Mickey-inspired horror game, showing the rodent covered with blood stains, also dropped on the same day.

Steamboat Willie, a 1928 short film featuring early non-speaking versions of Mickey and Minnie, entered the public domain in the US on New Year’s Day.

It means cartoonists, novelists and filmmakers can now rework and use the earliest versions of Mickey and Minnie.

79 points

People will look back on this era and say, “just because they could have doesn’t mean they should have.

permalink
report
reply
75 points

This feels like a backlash to the insane length of copyright terms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I suppose, but it feels more like a cheap cash grab to me.

If the game or the movie are anything more than mediocre, I’ll reconsider.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Oh, it’s undoubtedly that too. But if these characters had entered public domain decades ago like they should have, something similar would have been done and the novelty of beloved characters doing “shocking” things would have worn off.

Maybe backlash is the wrong word, but their own damn fault at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The game has a Nazi name, Nazi community moderators, a theme about killing vermin, a large right wing following online…

When you say your bar isn’t a Nazi bar but Nazis just keep showing up and hanging around, guess what you have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is the exact template for Blood and Honey, really. Put all $10 of your budget into the Public Domain sweetie, pay everyone else with exposure.

Laugh at the shitty but honest reviews all the way to the bank.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I don’t mind a good example being made of this. The original creator(s) are long dead and gone. All the current copyright laws do are prevent innovation and protect money flow of large corporations in my opinion. Is was originally so individuals who came up with new great ideas could reap the rewards of that idea. No longer is that the case.

“The Copyright Act of 1790 was the first statute in the United States to identify definite provisions of copyright law and permitted authors the right to their intellectual property for a duration of 14 years. Today, depending on the type of work, copyright terms can reach up to 120 years. Historically, Disney has been exceedingly protective of their intellectual property and is a prominent supporter and lobbyist for copyright term extension (Bernaski, 2014). Disney’s involvement in copyright term extension originates from their goal to prevent their copyrights from entering the public domain, specifically their Mickey Mouse character.”

Source of that quote.

I say make a good example of them. The creator should benifit from their creations, but ideas should not be stifled for generations to accomplish that.

Disclaimer: I have not read my source, shame on me if it is counter to my opinion. But corporations are not people, I don’t care what the SC says.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh I don’t disagree. I think the standard for most of the 20th century- 19 years with an option to renew for another 19, made a lot more sense. I just don’t praise these companies seeing dollar signs because they can capitalize off of a popular work becoming public domain almost the minute it enters the public domain either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree fundamentally, but I think, especially with AI faking stuff, we need to get back to people just writing things off as shitty ripoffs and ignoring them. Take away the novelty of it and it’ll go away. Disney made this particular bed. Now they gotta lay in it.

I for some reason have enough faith in humanity that once we how dumb this all plays out some realistic rules can be put in place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just because Disney could lobby to make copyright law insanely long doesn’t mean they should have. It wouldn’t have been s big event if Disney didn’t make it one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not talking about copyright law, and if you read a tiny bit further down, you would see that I talked multiple times about the problem with modern copyright law and Disney’s part in it.

Shitty copyright law doesn’t mean we have to have shitty movies and shitty video games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points
*

This looks awful, like that Pooh movie. This “make a horror story out of expired copyrights” trend is gonna get old, fast.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

I don’t care if it gets old, fuck copyrights and fuck Disney.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Absolutely fuck Disney, but Disney got fucked (from their perspective) by copyright law, not this movie. Maybe you could say the movie thumbs its nose at Disney, but the “damage” has already been done because Steamboat Willie is already public domain. Now should be the time for people to look for interesting things to do with the material. Instead, we’re getting whatever this is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

What? They got 95 years of publicly-funded protection. How is that getting fucked?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No. I absolutely will not gatekeep artwork that is used from the public domain. I don’t care. Even if I don’t like it doesn’t mean I will stoop to saying people should or shouldn’t be making it. This comment reeks of elitism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I heard the Pooh movie was good. Then I watched it. I probably won’t bother with this Mickey movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

bother

heh

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I mean, most movies are shit so what did you expect?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

So is this just going to happen with every single character that goes into public domain? Someone just has to make a garbage horror movie about them?

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Yeah.

Just like how people are more likely to want to stay standing up after having to sit for 8 hours for work/school.

There’s a social rubberbanding effect, just gotta get it out of our collective system so the tension is released, and then better content will come after that release.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If it’s the character thats the face of the organization that is the reason copyright law has been strengthened and enforced with iron rulings, then yes it damn well should happen. Disney is simply reaping what they sewed and they earend every last bit of it and more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Did you expect anything less?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Fuck Disney, Fuck Copyright laws and all of that, but there has got to be something more interesting to do with Mickey than a schlocky horror movie with a budget of two paper clips and a pack of gum

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Yes. But those things take time and don’t farm clicks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah they did this with Winnie the Pooh and afaik it wasn’t great. I get the idea, but lacks creativity if “it’s just opposite” is your draw card.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It was apparently profitable enough they are making a sequel

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I watched it. I was actually kind of excited. I enjoy cheesy horror movies. Including ones that know what they are. Movies like Skinamarink are amazing works of art, and i love it, but Llamageddon was a movie to watch with friends, have a few beers and a frozen pizza.

But I feel like when people make these movies, it’s a really fine line to walk, where it can easily just become bad. The Winnie the Pooh one unfortunate just missed the mark. It was just bad. Not the worst, but I don’t see myself watching it again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Other people will do it. You think only 1 group is going to take advantage of this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I’m glad you’re going to watch it. Let us know how it is!

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

If they really want to make a good movie with some decisive social commentary it should be about mickey enslaved by a “nameless” corporation (because of course everything else is copyrighted and trademarked still) and escaping. Would make an interesting thriller, there’s a lot that could be done to criticize copyright and the companies that abuse the system and their labor force.

Someone make this please, the idea is free (and so is the character)

permalink
report
reply
2 points

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 409K

    Comments