A new report from Americans for Tax Fairness found that America’s richest families accumulated $8.5 trillion in untaxed capital gains in 2022

America’s wealthiest families held an astounding $8.5 trillion in untaxed profits in 2022. According to a report from the nonprofit Americans for Tax Fairness, which analyzed Federal Reserve data, “one in every six dollars (18 percent of the nation’s unrealized gains is held by these roughly 64,000 ultra-wealthy households, who make up less than 0.05 percent of the population.” The report comes as the Supreme Court gears up to decide a case that could preemptively block any efforts to tax the wealth of billionaires.

The data looks at “quiet” income generated by “centi-millionaires,” Americans holding at least $100 million in wealth, and billionaires through unrealized capital gains. Those gains accumulate, untaxed, as assets and investments like stocks, real estate, bonds, and other investments increase in value. If those assets are not sold — or “realized” — they are not taxed, yet America’s wealthiest families can leverage that on-paper value increase to secure favorable loans with low-interest rates in lieu of using taxable income to finance their lifestyle.

“Of the $139 trillion in America’s national wealth, almost three-quarters (73 percent) is held by the richest 10 percent of households, over one-third (35 percent) by the richest 1 percent, and an astounding 11 percent — $15.2 trillion — is held by the handful of fortunate households that make up the billionaire and centi-millionaire class,” the report says. “The wealthiest 1 percent of households hold 44 percent of national unrealized gains ($21.2 trillion), with billionaires and centi-millionaires alone controlling 18 percent ($8.5 trillion).”

162 points

And yet people who want raises are the drag on the fucking economy.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

And all those damned social programs.

I know I’m on one, but that’s because I actually need it, not like everyone else who are just abusing it. Mostly those foreigners who are both lazy and murderous, but also stealing my job

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

When has the US turned into a regime led by the supreme court? All my life, whenever something was up, you heard what the president did or tried to do or whatever. Nowadays, all headlines about the US are about something the Supreme Court with it’s undemocratically elected judges gets to decide over all lawmaker’s heads.

permalink
report
reply
74 points

Congress being so bad at legislating has basically forced the Supreme Court to legislate. I obviously don’t agree with decisions like ending Roe v. Wade, but abortion should never have been up to them in the first place. Those kinds of decisions should be up to congress to make clear laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

We have a completely dysfunctional congress and its been only getting worse for decades. It’s a symptom of a much larger illness in America. I remember decades ago some of my most conservative family members debating policy with some of my most progressive over coffee. Now the media has pitted them against each other so much, that they literally have their phone numbers blocked in fear that some of their ideology might slip into their bubble of an echo chamber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Don’t worry, when Trump is reelcted, he’ll fix that glaring loophole and make himself supreme ruler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

A friend of mine used to call them ‘our mullahs’. I used to laugh him off. Now, I’m not so sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I do the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The Supreme Court has been powerful for a long time.

Since the early 19th century.

https://www.history.com/news/supreme-court-power-john-marshall

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Don’t forget about the most powerful person in the world, the parliamentarian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

This has always been the case. 3 co branches of government. The fact that you hadn’t heard it much is probably either a case of you paying more attention, or it getting more attention.

But yes, republicans have politicized the court, so it’s even more divisive now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The feeling I get is more that the famous checks and balances ceased to work and the supreme court is the branch getting the most power from this breakdown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

They wouldn’t have so much power if the legislature was functional. The majority of their ruling could be undone by Congress passing a law saying “No, that is not what we meant. Ignore this stupid ruling that willfully misinterpreted our law.”

Most of our government dysfunction comes back to Republicans refusing to compromise and weaponizing the filibuster to obstruct and prevent Congress from doing anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Not really because Congress can remove them from office if they get out of line. While I’ve certainly disagreed with many rulings, I can’t find any that I think are really out of line or some gross abuse of power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Technically, as they were Voted into Office by Senators representing the interests Voters, they are democratically elected via Representative Democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I guess if you change the definition of “democratically elected,” then sure. Supreme Court Justice is an appointed position. It’s literally the entire point of the distinction between the two (elected vs. appointed).

If you were to consider anyone appointed by an elected official as being “democratically elected,” then that would mean that nobody is appointed. It would become a distinction without a difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

So… are they appointed by the President without anyone having any say or is there a vote? If there is a vote by an elected body like the senate or congress, then they are democratically chosen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

This is how you get nobility. Before Reagan, wealth typically dissipated by the third generation. We are heading toward the old European model, where families are rich for a millennium.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Hopefully we can also head for the other old European model of dealing with them that the French popularized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly. They may not call themselves nobility but their influence is the same if not more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Billionaires are the real welfare queens

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Oh come on, Jeff Bezos needed that money, he lost money one year! Those tax returns were definately a make or break for him!

and to further clarify

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Fortunately for the billionaire class, Clarence Thomas’ legal opinion is always for sale.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Clarence Thomas is a traitor to the human race. He’d sell us out to aliens if given the chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 503K

    Comments