78 points

Wouldnt this be the reverse, with the prey animal only being able to see a 4:3 with both eyes?

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Screens don’t require 3d vision

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

No, they see more of the sides to detect predators. Predators eyes are forward, narrow cone of vision

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I wouldn’t call it narrow. It’s almost 180 degrees. More than enough for a 16x9 monitor

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The point is how much you can see without moving your eyes.

Yeah we can technically see a pretty wide range but that’s mainly peripheral. You can’t really make out details unless you move your eyes to look directly at something.

Whereas prey animal eyes aren’t supposed to be super detail oriented in the first place. So they can see more without moving their eyes to look directly at something because details aren’t important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Agreed- the comparison is missing the blind spot in the middle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s how I read it. If a narrow screen helps you see the details, it stands to reason that the high resolution part of your vision is narrower. The diagram is pointing to the prey to want a narrow monitor to fit where their vision is best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

I mean, it’s not, but do you King.

If the screen is inside your field of view, youre not losing detail using a 16:9 monitor.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

You do lose details in the sense of how much attention everything on screen gets. When looking at something, you don’t process everything in your FoV equally - for example you don’t notice lower resolutions outside your focus area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

If you’re not gaming on 9:16 you’re not a true gamer

permalink
report
reply
53 points

I game on 9:21. I’m seeing every damn cloud in the sky and every blade of grass down to my feet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

I prefer 16:10 but rotated 22°

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*

This guy games on Linux

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Maybe just try switching to a 4:3 resolution before investing in an entire monitor.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Cost breakdown of my 4:3 monitors:

Please take this, I’ll even pay for shipping if you need it shipped€

One of the smaller investments…

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Where in the fresh hell does one even get a 4:3 screen these days?

permalink
report
reply
82 points

I just took a 16x9 and hacked the sides off with a sawsall. It doesn’t work now, but I still feel superior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Attaboy show em who’s boss

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Thrift stores

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The second hand market. I don’t think many of them will even be 1080p or 60Hz, and i’m pretty sure you can forget about 4k

I have one listed on craigslist right now, for free because it’s broken. No takers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I used to have a CRT screen that was 1600x1200 @60hz, so high resolution ones do exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Hell yeah man, 4:3 CRT monitors are superior in almost every way. I have a monitor that does up to 1920x1440p@75hz, but the best ones do up to 2048x1536@80hz. Crazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

just get a 16:9 and play with the display settings to disable the edges

permalink
report
parent
reply

> Greentext

!greentext@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 1.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 455

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments

Community moderators