Whoopsies! “Free speech absolutist” “accidentally” suspends the accounts of journalists who are critical of him, and people whose political views he disagrees with.

He seems to have quite the habit of firing or banning people he disagrees with, doesn’t he?

Via Gizmodo:

"X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, purged an unknown number of prominent accounts over the last 24 hours with little to no explanation, and then restored the accounts minutes after this article was published.

"The list includes popular accounts belonging to journalists, writers, and podcasters. Among them are Ken Klippenstein of the Intercept, writer and podcaster Rob Rousseau, Texas Observer correspondent Steven Monacelli, the account for TrueAnon, a left-wing politics and news podcast, and a number of others.

"One thing the accounts have in common is recent criticisms of the Israeli government.

"Musk, who calls himself a “free speech absolutist” has previously said no one should be banned from X unless they break the law.

“Update, 1:12 p.m.: Shortly after this article was published, Musk responded to a question about the issue from far-right influencer Jackson Hinkle. Musk promised to investigate, and the accounts went back up soon after. Musk later blamed the “mistake” on X’s spam algorithms. The Hamas account is still suspended.”

Source: https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-x-twitter-journalists-banning-spree-1851151593

#Musk #ElonMusk #Twitter #X #FreeSpech #Tech #Technology @technology

8 points

Not sure what this has to do with technology.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

How the fuck did you used to use Twitter then? Smoke signals?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I just took a shit. Plumbing is a technology so maybe I’ll make a post about it here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just because something is hosted by technology doesn’t mean it’s about technology.

And article about Candy Crush’s financial statements wouldn’t be about technology either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Telepathy

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

being generous, this is post about whether the personal vissitudes of a CEO or a recalcitrant spam detector are to blame - the latter is technology the former is relevant if it’s being blamed on the latter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How about option 3: Musk’s success relies heavily on remaining visible in the media, so he does and says stupid shit to keep us talking about him and his companies. And we’re being absolute morons and doing exactly what he wants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Respectfully, that would be covered by “visscitudes.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No, Musk is an annoying slime ball with a ton of money thanks to mommy and daddy. But thanks to good PR in the past there are a lot of people that worship the ground he walks on, so we need to keep his stupidity visible in the media so that number doesn’t grow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’m tired of Musk stuff too, but the community rules does seems to allow it to certain degree:

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The community rules need to change.

A shitty tech owner being a shitty person isn’t newsworthy in the first place.

But this community is just as bad as /r/technology about being a Musk news feed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

@ajsadauskas Free speech absolutist is so funny. I made him cry and got ‘permanently’ suspended for about 3 months. https://twitter.com/weezmgk/status/1618352706766385153 @technology

permalink
report
reply
48 points

@ajsadauskas @technology Isn’t this typical of most “free speech” advocates?
Speech is free so long as you agree with them!

permalink
report
reply
8 points

free speech for me, not for thee

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

don’t lump in everyone with musk, there are many people that actually believe in free speech

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

@dannym Including me. Depending on how “free speech” is defined. The statement “I think the moon is made of bread dough” is ok. “The moon is made of bread dough” is not ok.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You didnt see the quotation marks?
OP is absolutely talking about those supposedly advocates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Elon post.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

But since he owns a technology company, literally anything he says and does it’s related to technology!

All posts like this are doing is giving the baby the attention he craves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Elon is a social hemophiliac: His skin is so thin that even the slightest cut makes him bleed.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 45K

    Comments

Community moderators