Targeting intelligence — the information used to conduct airstrikes and fire long-range artillery weapons — has played a central role in Israel’s siege of Gaza. A document obtained through the Freedom of Information Act suggests that the U.S. Air Force sent officers specializing in this exact form of intelligence to Israel in late November.

…on November 21, the U.S. Air Force issued deployment guidelines for officers, including intelligence engagement officers, headed to Israel. Experts say that a team of targeting officers like this would be used to provide satellite intelligence to the Israelis for the purpose of offensive targeting. 

“They’re probably targeting people, targeting officers,” Lawrence Cline, who served as an intelligence engagement officer in Iraq before retirement, told The Intercept. Targeting intelligence refers to the identification and characterization of enemy activities including missile and artillery launches, location of leadership and command and control centers, and key facilities. “What I can see is we’ve got a lot of global assets in terms of satellites and the like and the Israelis have a lot in terms of more localized radar coverage.”

2 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A document obtained through the Freedom of Information Act suggests that the U.S. Air Force sent officers specializing in this exact form of intelligence to Israel in late November.

“I’ve directed my team to share intelligence and deploy additional experts from across the United States government to consult with and advise the Israeli counterparts on hostage recovery efforts,” said President Joe Biden three days after the Hamas attack.

Targeting intelligence refers to the identification and characterization of enemy activities including missile and artillery launches, location of leadership and command and control centers, and key facilities.

This ban has been interpreted to include wartime targeting of civilians, according to a recent Foreign Affairs article by Brian Finucane, a former legal adviser for the State Department who now works for Crisis Group.

“For air advisory missions, which I imagine involve intelligence sharing and training, specific domestic legal restrictions such as the Leahy law and the assassination ban would likely come into play,” McBrien said.

Past administrations have also provided detailed public information about U.S. targeting support for the Saudi and Emirati military campaigns in Yemen, which U.S. officials claim was meant to reduce civilian casualties.


The original article contains 1,207 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
46 points

the U.S. Air Force issued deployment guidelines for officers, including intelligence engagement officers, headed to Israel. Experts say that a team of targeting officers like this would be used to provide satellite intelligence to the Israelis for the purpose of offensive targeting

So there’s wasn’t even a reason for them to be there?

Israel leveled most of Gaza, what good is aiming when you’re trying to hit everything?

And why are our only two options for presidents people that will support genocide?

Republicans won’t give a shit, but some Dems have standards and this shit depress turnout

permalink
report
reply
18 points

“I’ve directed my team to share intelligence and deploy additional experts from across the United States government to consult with and advise the Israeli counterparts on hostage recovery efforts,” said President Joe Biden three days after the Hamas attack.

Several weeks before they issued experts to help with hostage recovery efforts, allegedly. Which would be fair if that was the case, but there is no valid reason to assist Israel with their bombing campaign on Palestinians and gaza infrastructure.

I agree Biden is a terrible choice. We absolutely deserve other choices in a primary. But in a national vote between Trump and Biden, I’ll have no choice but to vote Biden. What a pathetic excuse for a democracy we have. I guess it’s kinda always been this way looking back at American history, it’s just so much more blatant now

permalink
report
parent
reply

They are probably consulting on bunker busting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The Intercept is far from right-wing, my friend. However they are credible. I would recommend checking out other articles on their site

Here’s a few

https://theintercept.com/2024/01/09/newspapers-israel-palestine-bias-new-york-times/

https://theintercept.com/2023/10/14/hamas-israel-palestinian-authority/

https://theintercept.com/2023/11/28/israel-palestine-history-peace/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

you should brush up on what the office of President entails.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

So either American targeting intelligence is absolutely garbage, or Americans are complicit in Israel’s genocide.

permalink
report
reply
-16 points

Or without US help the death toll would have been even higher.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah I doubt it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Without US JDAMs and billions of dollars worth of munitions? Sure…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

That’s a blatant misrepresentation of the situation!

…there’s no ‘either’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You’re right, my bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I wonder how many more civilian casualties there would be without US intelligence.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

Killing civilians is the point, so I’d imagine none.

Israelis are under order to shoot everyone on sight, which is how they ended up shooting Israeli hostages that were unarmed and begging for surrender.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Three months in and they are only at 0.004% of Palestinians dead from this war.

Seems like you just have sonething wrong. If killing civilians is the point why aren’t there more dead? Why are the daily casualty numbers trending downward?

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 283K

    Comments