20 points
*

I mean stop touching the damn boats. People be touching US boats like 4 times in history and it always turns out bad.

The Imperial Japanese Navy sank 8 US boats and we dropped the Sun on them. Twice.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

That’s the problem, you touch a US boat and you get bombed, the US fucks an entire region over and they face no consequence

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Guess nobody wanted to mess with the US?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The Houthis are blocking Israeli ports in response to genocide.

Why were US ships going to the ports of a country actively committing genocide?

The US is now bombing a sovereign nation to stop trade sanctions on a genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’re attacking commercial shipping vessels passing through the suez canal that have nothing to do with Israel or Palestine or the US. If you knew how how to read or think you’d already know this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

You don’t get to seal off a critical global shipping route just because you happen to be living next to it and don’t like where some of the cargo is going. This isn’t like the bosphorous, even a recognized Yemeni government wouldn’t have control over who can transit the strait unless they invaded Djibouti

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Why were US ships going to

They weren’t. While you may disagree with US Navy hanging out in the area, they’re in international waters and not trying to go to Israel. You could argue that attacking US ships proves the blockade story is a farce

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

America has been supplying Saudi with weapons to attack the Houthis with for many years.

The Houthis didn’t lose.

Why are people so mad that someone is actually standing up for human rights? The demands of the Houthis are very reasonable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What are the demands of the Houthis? I know they are Iranian-funded and trained, and that they’ve been warring with the Saudis for years. But now all of a sudden they are world news for attacking global shipping. I also know they say they are supporting the Palestinians, but that seems like a fig leaf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yemen wants Israel to end its genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It certainly looks like attention seeking and piracy for money

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

You write a lot of without knowing anything about the situation. Very interesting.

Please give me a different reason for the Houthis to attack shipping, it’s can’t be them standing up to genocide right? is it their scary religion which doesn’t mass murder kids in Gaza?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The Houthis don’t care about human rights and neither do the Saudis. The whole civil war is a mess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“standing up for human rights”

Meanwhile, on the Houthis flags: “death to Israel, death to America, Jews are a curse upon the land”

You, a joke of a person who needs to look in the mirror and laugh at yourself: “very reasonable people”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

We’re talking about their actions at this very moment. Not them as an organization.

If Kim Jong Un decided to block to Red Sea to support Palestinine instead of the Houthis it would be just as morally correct. If America did it too.

It’s about getting water, food and medicine to little children who are getting their legs amputated without anesthetics as if it’s a SAW movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The US is willing to kill untold number of people because otherwise the cheap shirts made by children in Bangladesh will arrive slightly late. I do hope for this evil empire to fucking die already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

For Bangladesh it’s probably faster to go east to get to the US. The majority of ships going through the Suez Canal are trading with Europe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No civilians died in the first strikes, and I’m not aware of any sources claiming any civilian deaths in these strikes either, which is probably to be expected given that they were against a military air base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Would you change your mind if Houthi soldiers died? What is civilians would die?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Idk seems like these airstrikes are doing more to fuck over shipping than the Houthis are.

Shipping Advised to Avoid Key Global Trade Way Point After Airstrikes

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Looked at a non paywall source, it was the US advising ships to avoid the area for the next couple days because they plan on doing more strikes and don’t want other ships caught in the crossfire

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

It’s paywalled, but the US (and UK) are always bad news

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Am I missing something? Seems like they’re defineding civilians here

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

They are protecting their civilians or the ones they can benefit from, and killing others who are not, they are not doing this in good faith

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

No. They’re attacking one of the few countries that’s doing something about Israel’s genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Cargo ships can take a longer route, they don’t need to be there. The US values cargo over human lives.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 274K

    Comments