220 points

Ok a 50 page memo? That’s pretty friggin long. Depends how many of those you get a day.

But:

I summed up this highly classified memo into Trump’s sort of bombastic language because it was the only way he was gonna understand," Taylor added. “I mean, I literally said in there, ‘You know, if we leave Afghanistan too fast, the terrorists will call us losers. But if we wanna be seen as winners, we need to make sure the Afghan forces have the strength to push back against these criminals.’ I mean, it was that dumb and that’s how you had to talk to him.”

permalink
report
reply
141 points
*

#ExplainlikeImTrump needs to be a thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Please no…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I could take about 30 seconds of it, but nothing more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

When /Explainlikeimfive is too complicated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

#ExplainLikeImOrange

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Jesus fucking Christ man, what the actual fuck?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We had an insentient lump of lard in the oval office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-61 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
138 points
*

No. The President of the United States of America needs to be able to internalize and contextualize the details of the current geopolitical climate over corn flakes. This “only human” bullshit has got to go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Absolutely agree with you. The point I wanted to make is that there are different ways to summarise, say, in this example, a 50-page memo. The sad thing here is how the official needed to resort to the good versus evil false dichotomy. This oversimplification to have been required because, unfortunately, Trump is stupid.

I guess I’m saying that it’s a shame that there are probably a lot of smart people trying to make sense of all the geopolitics, picking things apart, critical thinking… but in the end it was all for nought; they had to appeal to someone - Trump - who never really wanted to, nor was able to, internalise or contextualise it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yep, it’s literally the job (or what it should be).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah I’m a normal human and I have no trouble reading at a highschool level why can’t the president do it?

permalink
report
parent
reply

A 50 Page memo is too long. It is relevant for the discussion of the details between the specialised people, so they reach a highly qualified opinion, but the cause and effects of different decision options need to be summarised on a few pages. Of course the president needs to be able to understand what the bullet points entail, but it is literally impossible for a president of a country the size of the US to read up on the details of every decision.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

There is a succinct summary and then there is saying things like “If we don’t do this, the bad guys win,” which is the level of dumbing down that had to be done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

deep state n. 1. People in government who don’t stop doing their jobs just because there was an election; e.g. police and prosecutors who continue to pursue murderers without asking the new mayor whether to let that one go. 2. (Federal) People in government capable of reading at an 8th-grade level or higher.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

6th*

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Nothing new here. We heard things like this a few months into his presidency.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

and even before it began. “Official close to the matter says that transition team briefings have to be written in crayon using words with fewer than three syllables. …”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

And they have to make sure they don’t use any of the good tasting colours just in case Trump gets hungry while ‘drafting documents’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Trump can’t draft anything… bone spurs

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wait I thought he wasn’t in the military.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We started hearing things like this in the 1980s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

At this point it’s like saying that water is wet.

permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

I can’t be the only one not surprised by this

permalink
report
reply
25 points

I’d be surprised if it doesn’t come out that he had to have people read documents to him. because he can’t read.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

The ghostwriter for “Art of the Deal” said “I seriously doubt that Trump has ever read a book straight through in his adult life.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

My first thought

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think we both know…that THERE’S NO FILM IN THAT CAMERA!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I am. I was surprised he actually gave him words. I figured it’d be pictures

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 472K

    Comments