184 points

Haley might be the smartest person in the GOP room right now. She got herself a gig in the Trump administration, but one that kept her in NYC and away from most of the crazies in the Trump Orbit. She had to promote Trump’s foreign policy, of course, but had wide latitude in terms of how to do it. She notably had a hard line against Russia while we know Trump’s history with Putin.

She was capable of doing her job without stepping in anything foul. And she got some one-on-one time with other high-level diplomats. If there is any dirt on Trump and his foreign business dealings, she has it.

Haley might make a horrible President, but she is not an election denier and she is not in Putin’s pocket, so she already has a few advantages over most of the GOPniks these days.

permalink
report
reply
88 points

If there is any dirt on Trump and his foreign business dealings, she has it.

Which is probably why Trump is implying that he has scandalous information about her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Every accusation a confession. Always.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

It’s in the Dictator’s Handbook I think. You can see the exact same thing in Russia’s official communication too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I wonder what she has on him.

Maybe it was her job to return Putin’s boots after they’d been licked clean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Every accusation is a confession

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

If I had to wager, her plan may be to stay in to the end despite losing every primary, just in case something goes south for Trump legally. Trouble is, he’s going to savage her politically and many of his supporters will never vote for her

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Trouble is, he’s going to savage her politically and many of his supporters will never vote for her

Sure. On the other hand…

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article284562880.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

“The worst kept secret in politics is how badly the Democrats want to run against Donald Trump,” Haley said. “A Trump nomination is a Biden win and a Kamala Harris presidency … I defeat Biden handily.”

Yeah this is my understanding.

I don’t really understand it (despite everyone explaining it n times) but if the GOP want to win all they need to do is field a young candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Shes got the Koch billion dollar donation network behind her. I think her plan is to make as much of their money as possible, which they are glad to give to have a possible president directly in their pocket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

So what you are saying is we have found the only non trump anti genocide candidate?

And it pisses him off more?

I’m off to donate to her campaign

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It would be interesting to see Kamala Harris vs. Nikki Haley in a future election – Two Indian-American woman vying for the US presidency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

No thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

interesting in the same way putting tobasco sauce in your eyes is interesting

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

No coronations pls. Let’s have some actual primaries with policy. On both sides.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Not American, so honestly I’d prefer her to be the candidate even if she does beat Biden.

Obviously Biden vs. Trump is more likely to result in a Biden win, but a Haley presidency is arguably preferable to even the risk of a second Trump presidency.

If he’s re-elected and undermines NATO, the risk of Russia making a mistake in the baltics, and things getting out of control are very very real. Trump II is quite simply an existential threat at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Obviously Biden vs. Trump is more likely to result in a Biden win

The sad thing is that we’re not sure. Trump voters don’t vote “rationally”, it’s a cult like thing that was cultivated during Biden’s term. They are taught to refute all facts and go by gut feeling instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Don’t think it started then. Fox News, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, hell Father Charles Coughlin and the America First Committee. Suspect it’s partly related to that Asimov quote:

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I suspect Trump v Biden would be a tighter race than expected. Trump supporters enthusiasticly show up to vote. The majority of Americans may prefer Biden over trump but will they make the effort to vote for a man they aren’t enthusiastic about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

My reasoning is that no one is particularly enthusiastic about Biden.

People will however turn up to vote against Trump.

Will people turn up to vote against Haley in as large numbers? I have my doubts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Haley has a much stronger chance of winning the presidency than Trump imo. She could win the independent vote, and Democrat voters may not turn out as much if she’s the alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She also wants to ban Gender Affirming Care in all 50 states

permalink
report
parent
reply
118 points

He wants her out so he can start fund raising as the de facto nominee. The other reason he wants her out is that it shows his weakness… even if she loses every race it shows that 30-40% of republican primary voters don’t want him. She should stay in at least until Super Tuesday just to piss him off.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

She should stay in until the general election. There is a non zero chance he has a stroke or an MI. He is not doing well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

MI = myocardial infarction?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Last I heard, her plan is exactly that:

Stay in until at least Super Tuesday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yuuuuup. I think she’s out raising him, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Yes, like all the other narcissists, people (in particular women) not doing what he wants really upsets him. This is nothing new.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Not just women, but since she’s of Indian descent, I’m sure he thinks of her as “a woman of color”. I’m sure she gets under his skin almost as much as other “disrespectful, uppity, don’t know their place” women like Fani Willis and Letitia James, and I’m here for it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

His Achilles heel is people actually opposing him.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Especially when they dare to be women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

This is smart. She’s probably just sitting and waiting for the Supreme Court ruling. By some rare chance that Supreme Court sides the Colorado ruling. Trump is immediately disqualified for running for President and she becomes the nominee by default

permalink
report
reply
11 points

It isn’t quite that easy is it? Can’t they simply rule that CO has the right to run their elections how they see fit without weighing in specifically on whether Trump should be disqualified?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

They have to walk a very fine line, because too far in either direction fucks them. Give the states too much power and they can kick off trump. Give the states too little power and Democrats can counterattack voter suppression

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I love the way you think

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not that simple. It sends a message to the entire nation. If it’s held up every voter is aware he is an inferior candidate. And if it doesn’t, the GOP can say “look how bad they are at it”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s true, I just don’t see how they don’t uphold it. Then again, the GOP lives for hypocrisy and their chosen few run the court now so…

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments