Since the Sanitation Services Inc employed by the slaughterhouses got fined for this, Arkansas under Huckabee signed a law removing requirements to verify ages of anyone working under 16. Aka no one is liable if children are working in slaughterhouses and getting chemical burns.

Here’s a picture of one of the kids.

8 points

absolute silence from the fascist right wing ‘protect the children’ people.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Death to America

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Why no solidarity with the comrades who suffer under the system?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

always the same map

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Location: New York City

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Of course it was in NYC

Makes me think of an addiction intervention. All of your friends and family come over to your place to tell you they love you and the decisions you’re making are destructive. The whole world came over to the US to talk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Land of the free to work full time as a child

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Do you have some sauce for this? Not saying you’re making it up, but I need to understand this better.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I’m not sure if I entirely follow. So they don’t need to verify (effectively legalizing child labour), but why would that remove liability for injuries?

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

They feign ignorance, and because the law bends to capital in the US, they get off with a tiny tiny fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The wording could be better, it’s meant that they’re not liable for hiring kids since they can say that they didn’t know, are not responsible for knowing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah, that’s the child labour bit. But you don’t suddenly turn immune to chemical burns once you’re 16, so why would they not be liable for injuries? Even if they claim their workers to be 16, somebody still got hurt. I’m not familiar with the US legal system here, so forgive my ignorance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Presumably these kids are very poor and/or immigrants. Someone needs to take a case for them to be held liable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Liable for hiring children, I thought the OP meant.

But there is an issue with liability for injury. Securing a legal remedy requires knowing one’s rights, knowing how to express those rights, and knowing how to start the litigation process. Children are unlikely to know any of these, considering most adults don’t, either. And a state that allows child labour is unlikely to set up any mechanisms to provide that knowledge or make the litigation procedure easier to navigate. So even if the employer could technically be liable for workplace injuries, the chances of being sued successfully are slim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

In February, the labor department fined PSSI $1.5m for employing at least 102 children ages 13 to 17 across 13 meat-packing plants in eight states. The fine amounts to $15,138 for each child, the maximum penalty under federal law.

No one went to jail. Cool country.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

They’ll save that and more in wages every year.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Late Stage Capitalism

!latestagecapitalism@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 439

    Monthly active users

  • 727

    Posts

  • 3.8K

    Comments