1 point

This is the best summary I could come up with:


With a divided electorate and gridlock in Congress, the next American president could easily become consumed by manifold challenges at home — before even beginning to address flashpoints around the world, from Ukraine to the Middle East.

In campaign speeches, Trump remains skeptical of organizations such as NATO, often lamenting the billions the U.S. spends on the military alliance whose support has been critical to Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion.

Politics at University College London, said that whoever wins the presidential race, the direction of travel will be the same – toward a multipolar planet in which the United States is no longer “the indisputable world superpower.”

Germany is the second-largest donor of military aid to Kyiv, behind the U.S., but Scholz recently told German weekly Die Zeit that the country couldn’t fill any gap on its own if “the U.S.A. ceased to be a supporter.”

China, where leaders’ initial warmth toward Trump soured into tit-for-tat tariffs and rising tensions, little changed under Biden, who continued his predecessor’s tough stance toward the United States’ strategic rival.

Associated Press writers Jiwon Song in Seoul, South Korea, Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin, Dasha Litvinova in Tallinn, Estonia, Suzan Fraser in Ankara, Turkey, Nomaan Merchant in Washington, and Jill Colvin and Michelle Price in New York contributed to this story.


The original article contains 1,315 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

Why the heck and when was the United States considered reliable?

Reliable in what context?

Oh I see defensively reliable.

It might not make a lot of sense to overwhelmingly rely your national defense on a partner separated by an ocean.

I’m glad the EU is taking more responsibility for their own defense, and I’m also surprised to see so many European leaders acting surprised that they should have to, or the idea of a European defense as a novel idea.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

The US was considered reliable because, until Trump, both parties had identical foreign policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And had credible defense too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Which is actually a bad thing, because it doesn’t give voters a choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Whith only two parties there isnt much to choose between anyway

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

No they didn’t.

At least, I can’t think of examples of democrats and Republicans having similar foreign policy, outlook strategy or execution.

You mean specifically in the interests of defending Europe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

As an outsider, the US was always very reliable for exporting unfettered liberal capitalism, and exporting “democracy”, whatever the party in power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

EU was basically following US orders to be a vassal under the big military umbrella of the USA and join NATO instead of forming their own strong military. It only started shifting after 9/11. The 2% rule was only introduced in 2014. The 60 years before, USA and Britain were rather pleased certain EU members were not building big armies, it implied promise of peace within…

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.

permalink
report
reply

Kissinger’s more of an egoist of image than a realist about it

Word should be gotten to Nixon that if Thieu meets the same fate as Diem, the word will go out to the nations of the world that it may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Henry Kissinger

How I’m missing yer

You’re the Doctor of my dreams

With your crinkly hair and your glassy stare

And your machiavellian schemes

I know they say that you are very vain

And short and fat and pushy but at least you’re not insane

Henry Kissinger

How I’m missing yer

And wishing you were here

Henry Kissinger

How I’m missing yer

You’re so chubby and so neat

With your funny clothes and your squishy nose

You’re like a German parakeet

All right so people say that you don’t care

But you’ve got nicer legs than Hitler

And bigger tits than Cher

Henry Kissinger

How I’m missing yer

And wishing you were here

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

The first Trump administration stress-tested the bonds between the U.S. and its allies, particularly in Europe. Trump derided the leaders of some friendly nations, including Germany’s Angela Merkel and Britain’s Theresa May, while praising authoritarians such as Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. He has called China’s Xi Jinping “brilliant” and Hungary’s Viktor Orbán “a great leader.”

This is so stupid. Trump was the one who started a trade war with China. Him praising Xi doesn’t mean shit.

Secondly, despite claiming to be anti-west, Erdogan and Orban are both pro-West allies and will fall in line under pressure. Both countries are NATO members too btw. Why is such a democratic organization like NATO having “authoritarian” countries as members?

Also why is there no mention of Modi? Both Biden and Trump have been more than friendly with him.

Trump’s Israel policy is no different. He is more belligerent towards Iran.

In campaign speeches, Trump remains skeptical of organizations such as NATO, often lamenting the billions the U.S. spends on the military alliance whose support has been critical to Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion.

Rhetoric and actions are entirely different. Trump knows very well that Ukraine War is ultimately beneficial for the U.S. and the MIC.

Another thing to keep in mind, U.S. is NATO, without the U.S there is no NATO.

He warned: “We must realize that the EU cannot be an economic and civilizational giant and a dwarf when it comes to defense, because the world has changed.”

That has been the status of Europe since end of cold war, a puppet of American capitalism, nothing more. And nothing will change unless there is a socialist revolution or something.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Wait what now? Trump knows something about foreign policy? Not a chance, bub. Trump doesn’t know squat. Other than being an effective distraction from his handlers so the ones actually pulling the strings can stay out of the public’s general awareness. But, then again, he’s stupid enough to think he matters, so I doubt he even realizes he has handlers.

Trump doesn’t do strategy. Period. He’s dumber than a stack of bricks, and you know it. So, no, there is absolutely no ulterior motive. There is no plan. He has no ability to think ahead. He has never had to take any actual responsibility, and is therefore utterly incapable of anything other rash impulsive stupidity.

Giving that loser any credit just makes you sound like a complete idiot. Just don’t. Please.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Rhetoric and actions are entirely different

Yes, but libs can’t tell a difference. They don’t even need different rhetoric, just tone usually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Oh it doesn’t matter man, Trump, Biden’s draugr, Kamala, not important. This goose is cooked and you’re all cooked with it if you don’t sever ties. We saw what happened to Europe’s oil, energy and manufacturing sector with just a couple well-placed underwater bombs. The American bourgeois state will eat all of it’s “allies” like Saturn and his children if it means staving off profit collapse for one more quarter .

permalink
report
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments