Journalist says he finds it ‘surreal’ to have account on X suspended after writing critique of platform::The author’s account had over 100,000 followers and was around 14 years old, he said

231 points

I wouldn’t call it “surreal” at all, I’d call it “completely expected” given who runs that platform

permalink
report
reply
86 points

Elon Free Speech Musk himself? Never!

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

He must have a tiny pp to be that insecure

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Elon Musk’s pp? As it was in the beginning, so shall it be in the end. Very tiny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The two aren’t mutually exclusive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Depressing how quickly this kind of stuff went from outrageous to completely normal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
143 points

Quit. Using. Twitter.

permalink
report
reply

Person eating shit: THIS TASTES BAD, SOMEBODY SHOULD CHANGE THE TASTE

Quit eating shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But all my friends are in the shit restaurant!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But the shit now costs money, I’m gonna ram it in my body.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

“But I’ve never had problems with the SS before…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Louder for those in the back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I stopped using it before muskrat bought it.

I stop caring after i reported so many bots and a farm started harassing me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was on the fence about leaving…I didn’t use it very much to begin with, but it was useful for checking in on bands for whom Twitter was their preferred social media.

But the day that I read that Twitter was considering accepting Lone Skum’'s offer to buy it, I immediately deleted my account. Whether he ended up buying it or not, the fact that they’d even consider his offer told me all I needed to know. Twitter had become such an essential tool for so many oppressed people across the globe that for them to even entertain the idea of selling it to that pompous, no-talent cunt in order to enrich their shareholders was enough to hasten my exit.

That being said, once that sale was made…while I’d have preferred to see $44 billion go to the working class instead of a bunch of wealthy shareholders, I am much happier seeing it split up instead of remaining in the coffers of a bigoted fuck billionaire whose own kid disowned him. Fuck him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It was enough of a dumpster fire before it got all musky. After it got the preputial gland the edgelords became MOR and there was no arguing past their mechanical circle jerk of atavism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

As if anyone reading this thread uses Twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’d be surprised. There’s a ton of people who came to Lemmy due to the Reddit API fiasco and still visit there daily, Twitter addiction is no different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

O’Reilly said if he did not get his account back it would be “personally, quite annoying but professionally quite depressing” as Twitter was his route into his current profession as a journalist and author. He used it as a “shop front” in ways, he said.

“I was very, very reluctant to be a Twitter doomer because it had done so much for me… But it’s really at the point where it doesn’t really work in practical terms. It is not as useful as an object as it used to be. It incentivises lots of extremely negative and hateful speech and has really made that a big kind of calling card of its business for the last year or two… that you can go on there and say anything.”

Fediverse is waiting.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Glad I stopped using Twitter eons ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

Social networks that do this should lose any safe harbor provisions. Government are so fucking far behind with basic common sense.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Absolutely. You cannot claim safe harbor while banning stuff like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

i hate banning anyone as much as the next anarcho-dingus but afaik there’s no law against banning whoever you want and i’m not sure there should be one. i don’t know what the answer is, if it isn’t public control of all social media.

maybe some public funded internet services such as defederated twitter and reddit alternatives? completely open and paid for with taxes, in direct competition with their for-profit contemporaries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Like the BBC mastadon instance social.bbc

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Well that’s actually exactly what I’d expect

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 531K

    Comments