5 points
*

Every time I see this meme, I get progressively closer to understanding what they want to solve

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Philosophy > science

Fight me

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Science is philosophy. Somewhere along the way people seem to have forgotten that

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Here’s a fun game:

Pick any Wikipedia article. Click the first link. Keep clicking the first link. Eventually you’ll end up at Philosophy and forever be in a loop going back to Philosophy.

Turns out conscious thinking and applying logical rigor is the basis for everything we perceive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Apparently, there is a wikipedia article about this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Getting_to_Philosophy

I really wish this article wouldn’t link to philosophy, but it does…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I found an exception:

Starting from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/English: Help:IPA/English > Alphabet > Letter (alphabet) > Symbol > Sign (semiotics) > Semiotics > Help:IPA/English

If you don’t think the IPA link counts as “the first link”, then

Starting from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_language: Japanese language > Japonic languages > Japanese language

will also cause a loop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

If this is true, then every wikipedia page will eventually lead to wikipedia of Greek, because the philosophy page leads to greek.

Hence, Greek best country confirmed by wikipedia?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’m trying this out.

Here’s the results: Shadow King (Marvel character): success after about 10 links

Ernest Shackleton (article of the day): 10 clicks

Wikipedia (the article): 4 clicks

Church of the Holy Mother of God, Bolshiye Saly: 14 clicks

James Loren Martin: 24 clicks

Annette Ziegler: 14 clicks

Almost all of them went through Philosophy of Science or Philosophy of Art. Seems like a pretty reliable rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There seem to be a couple of loops where you always end up circling between the same through pages

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Started off at the page for Ham, and yep, it ended up on philosophy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

You know what I mean, brother. There’s a huge scope of difference between applied sciences and natural philosophy. Our technological advancements fail to resolve fundamental questions about the human condition. Scientists rarely study epistemology or philosophy in order to attain our degrees and I think it shows in the public trend toward scientism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Scientism is so pervasive and so ridiculous. For example there’s people who say magic isn’t real because science can explain it. No shit science can explain it, that’s the point of science. It’s people defining science in opposition to magic based on cultural values instead of actually knowing what science is. https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/tautological-denial-of-magic-0e311ca94c2a

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Aaking the important questions

permalink
report
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 83K

    Comments