13 points

I think (hope) people are downvoting because they think this is an anti-woke screed rather than dismantling such centrist propaganda.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

It isn’t immediately clear from the top that this is a critique of how the book in question is utter bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I can’t even see the downvotes (and I sincerely love it). This right here is why downvoting is stupid: it’s lazy commentary, and people who can see it are left wondering why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Downvoting is an important method of grassroots quality control when used correctly, you just have to actually take the time to see what it is that you’re downvoting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

when used correctly

This is the core problem. It’s disruptive when used incorrectly; there’s no way to ensure it’s used correctly, and then people like OP are left scratching their heads.

The better option is to engage or move on. If you think someone deserves a downvote, show it with your words. Nobody knows the true intentions behind a downvote, otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

I don’t understand where this position that dems embraced neo-liberalism and abandoned unions comes from.

Who passed “right to work” laws in state houses all over the country? Who supported money as a form of speech in Citizens United? Who has tried to suppress the raising of the minimum wage at every opportunity?

Not dems, afaik. Dems have consistently fought these things.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Ed Burmila holds a Ph.D. in political science and is the author of Chaotic Neutral: How the Democrats Lost Their Soul in the Center.

Obviously this guy has a grudge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They don’t have to start actively attacking the unions to have abandoned them. Clinton was the main break point.

https://www.lawcha.org/2016/11/23/bill-clinton-remade-democratic-party-abandoning-unions-working-class-whites/

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I can definitely see an argument for Clinton, the champion of NAFTA, moving in a neo-liberal direction, but calling it some broader break-point where the whole democratic party abandoned labor is a much, much broader claim. Wouldn’t you say?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

there are factions within any party that can be ascendant in any given cycle (measured in decades). I am guessing this may be obvious to you, but reagan and the dirty tricks full court press by the republicans terrified the “left” in the US and made it easier for neo-liberal mindshare to metastasize in the democratic party.

clinton style neo-lib ideology didnt get much resistance because it seems that the dems have been the place where anyone to the left of attila the hun moved and set up shop for quite a while.

so the arc of the democratic party continues to ebb and flow. hopefully the “new left” will make a permanent mark on it and course correct the neo-lib terror of the last 30 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The problem is that Clinton’s neoliberalism and rejection of the unions both wasn’t just Clinton (he didn’t get a revolt from other Democrats over NAFTA) and the results weakened the unions so they were less valuable to Democrats. Neoliberal economic policy has been the dominant philosophy of the party establishment for 30 years now, to the detriment of the unions. Hell, many of those establishment politicians were already in power during Clinton’s term.

Now, this doesn’t mean “all Democrats never listen to unions”, but they’re just often not a priority. And hopefully it’s changing. Biden’s done some meaningfully pro-union things (albeit with one very high-profile anti-union thing), and the resurgence of the labor movement in general means they’re more powerful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Dems have definitely been consistently more pro-union than Republicans, but not nearly as pro-union as they used to be or could be. Biden has actually been a serious move in that direction in terms of his NLRB appointments and rhetoric, but there’s a lot farther to go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That I can agree with. I’ve been very pleased with the inroads unions have been making in just the past few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Right? In my state, Right to Work was repealed as soon as Democrats had full control of the legislative and executive branches. Republicans passed it while completely disregarding Dems practically screaming that is was union busting and a horrible idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Unsurprisingly, the authors saying “Wokeness is to blame for Democrats not having an overwhelming majority!” are old white men.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I’m so tired of this “woke agenda” bullshit. Being Woke means one thing and only one thing. It simply means you’ve been disillusioned from “the land of the free” rhetoric we’ve all been fed since we were children and you acknowledge that the institutions that have been built up in the US, whether intentionally or otherwise, disproportionately disenfranchise minorities. It has jack shit to do with climate change, politics, abortion, or gun control. (Other than maybe how those things contribute to racist institutions) being for Abortion rights or climate action or gun control does not automatically make you ‘woke’. Not unless you’re approaching those issues specifically from the angle of fixing how this country has historical treated POC. Unfortunately, that’s basically never the case and liberal policies that do end up being put in place either don’t address minority issues at all or they may even exacerbate them.

I’m so sick of it being used as a catch all term for anything republicans disagree with. It takes the word away from its actual meaning and risks us forgetting what it actually stood for in the first place. And that’s a shame. Because it’s messaging is important. And the more watered down it gets the more we’ll ignore the already downtrotten in this country.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

it’s a litmus test. like antifa before it and sjw before that and feminist before that. I just hope I’m still hip enough to spot the next one coming round the bend

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments