113 points

Bob Moore sounds like he was a good dude. If more business leaders thought like him we’d all be a lot better off.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Sells good steel cut oats

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m worried it’s the end of an era. They have really high quality product, all of it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Could use more organic, though

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

But that’s the point: that level of wealth and power is unhealthy. For literally everyone. We can’t just hope more of these insanely privileged people resist corruption and greed to do the right thing and treat their employees fairly (more than fairly, in this case). He was a good dude all right, but a huge exception to the overwhelming norm of wealthy people exploiting their workers…

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Socalism is quite a nice concept and one that has the potential to be implemented at a large scale.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

This sounds like a mondragon corporation, a specific type of co-op primarily from the Basque region: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation?wprov=sfti1#

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

Bob was genuinely a good man and the Red Mill products are amazing.

permalink
report
reply
50 points
*

Communism! How dare he! Giving power to the people who built his wealth from? Might as well give him a parade in Red square!

But seriously people shouldn’t be able to transfer their corporations to their families. Once you die/retire it goes to the workers by law. If you didn’t amass enough wealth in that time frame maybe you should have budgeted better. Why should current and future workers continue supporting wealthy peoples children.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Estate taxes are the way to deal with that. Otherwise you potentially get massive distortionary effects from people trying to dump all their ownership into liquid assets right before they die, assuming that’s what you meant by wealth. It also gets odder when you no longer have a single owner. Jeff Bezos is fabulously wealthy and holds lots of stock in Amazon, but he does not own Amazon outright. You could say that when he dies, his stock goes to the workers. Okay, what about stock held by funds like Vanguard or pension funds? What does death even mean then? It’s a whole mess, or you could go with the simpler estate tax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s just a larger issue with run away capitalism. If politicians, judges, and presidents weren’t in for the money as well. Immorality should never be rewarded. #Vote

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think that’s why the extremely wealthy all have foundations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hmmm, how so? My impression is that it is so that they can write it off on their taxes, but still how control over how the money is spent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I mean, private ownership of capital should just not be provided and enforced by government in the first place, that would be a lot simpler than some automatic death-bed transfer. End capitalism, before it ends us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Communism

Socialism, actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

People are careful with their words on this and often act like it’s a gift. It’s an ESOP so he sold it to his employees. That said, it’s still a better model than selling to a public company and I’m sure he did take a loss on it compared to that.

permalink
report
reply
48 points
*

From the perspective of the employee it basically is a gift (more a benefit).

Employees don’t pay for stock in an ESOP; they’re earned by being employed there (with different options for how they’re divided, but restrictions so they aren’t excessively dominated by the highest earners).

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments