This is not so much about a particular post but rather to document Jakob Nielsen’s relentless generative AI boosting.

His weekly updates are so saturated with AI subject matter and every image is AI generated they are unreadable and I can only assume the text is AI generated as well. It really doesn’t matter if it isn’t, in fact, because he’s demonstrating in real-time how damaging the AI aesthetic is to a brand.

He also seems to be mentioning his 40 years of expertise a lot more, which might be a reaction to some negative feedback. I want to dig deeper, but I don’t like the feeling that I’ll have to read generated stuff carefully.

His latest newsletter triggered this post because he links to a terrible AI generated song he made (with the line “Jakob Nielsen with UX fame, forty-one years, still in the game”) and spends most of the newsletter talking about the process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYt12jr5yUY

11 points

one of the key goals of AI-generated songs is to populate the long tail of domain-specific content

I’m so glad I have no idea what this means because it’s surely stupid and awful.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

If I were to guess (shoot me if I’m mansplaining) he’s suggesting we use AI in cultural niches to generate content. i.e. the thing where AI doofuses think it’s cool to automate the fun parts of human experience out of our hands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You know you’ve done bad when you create the conditions for “got to give him credit for putting the work in” to this guy https://youtu.be/JZYZoQQ6LJQ

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

fuck yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I hate that you linked that and I hate that I clicked on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

i lasted 27 seconds

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Thanks, hate it. Amazing how much of it is just either ‘im rich!’ or ‘buzzword’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I like playing with these generative models but they’re strictly for making weird pictures and stupid songs. Seeing the usage these very serious people make of it it’s like they’re looking into Fisher-Price hardware for the office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

spam, spam, spam

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
10 points

genuinely sorry. I needed an outlet because I’m hate-subscribed to his newsletter and it keeps getting worse

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

He also seems to be mentioning his 40 years of expertise a lot more, which might be a reaction to some negative feedback. I want to dig deeper, but I don’t like the feeling that I’ll have to read generated stuff carefully.

I don’t know anything about this dude beyond what I just read on wikipedia but a guy like this spruiking AI is probably just grasping at straws as he is swept downstream away from relevancy.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

he’s the “Nielsen” of Nielsen Norman Group where “Norman” is Donald Norman of The Design Of Everyday Things fame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

i remember when i used to hang on nielsen’s every word, like 20 years ago

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

because it’s funny

from https://web.archive.org/web/20240210054003/https://www.uxtigers.com/about/people his cv presented in an image without alt text

credit to Matt May for spotting this one https://mstdn.social/@mattmay/112037962750954987

p.s. read his great response to the last shitty Nielsen newsletter about AI generated accessibility: https://buttondown.email/practicaltips/archive/we-need-to-talk-about-jakob/

permalink
report
reply
4 points

@fasterandworse Published a book about hypertext two years before the Web… but two years after Hypercard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 491

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments

Community moderators