13 points

Nate Silver… Wasn’t he the bad guy from Time Cop?

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

“Do us a favor? Lay off the fucking candy bars already huh?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Nate makes some very valid points, unfortunately. We needed Biden to step down and someone like Whitmer, Polis, or Newsom to run six months ago.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

A lot of commentators that I respect have pointed out that Biden ought to do more public events that would help to allay public doubts about his mental sharpness. The problem is, one can infer the reason that Biden is not doing them — namely that the White House comms team is rational and has inferred that the cost of doing them outweighs the benefits because Biden is too likely to come across poorly.

Biden has done fewer interviews than any recent president, and it’s not close. By this point in their presidencies, Barack Obama had given more than 400 interviews and Trump had given more than 300. Biden has given fewer than 100.

Mr. Biden has especially shunned interviews with major newspapers. Since taking office, he has not done a single interview with reporters from a major newspaper.

How much longer can they keep hiding him and covering for him?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

He’s given plenty of speeches recently but they aren’t covered.

Even the non-rightwing press is being pushed into the RW talking points.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You might read the article a bit more carefully.

Silver is distinguishing unscripted speeches and/or interviews from scripted speeches, of which yes, there are many.

The question isn’t whether Biden can read from a script it’s whether he can respond off the cuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m not convinced this is valid criticism as much as supposition.

The guy is busy actually doing the job. He doesn’t nesc have time right now to fanny around giving leisurely interviews. Stuff is happening, you know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

discussing valid criticisms is not RW talking points

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Criticizing Biden for not making public speeches when he has been in fact making plenty public speeches makes it not a valid criticism

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

That probably has more to do with his stutter than anything else. Look up lifetime interviews for the average politician with a record close to Biden’s. He probably has less all across the board. Because a stutter makes you look bad in an interview, even though it shouldn’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

At this point its obviously not a stutter, and anyone still claiming that is in denial

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He does have a stutter but that’s no excuse to not do public interviews and press conferences. If he can’t do the bare minimum…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Same sentence could be said for Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

maybe neither of them should be president

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’d be sweet. Please vote in your primary!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Id be fine with that, but ill take Biden level mental slowness and gaffes and older age over Trumps absolute chaos agenda and sheer madness any day. The difference is incredible and the fact that people pay attention to Bidens age so much tells me how un calibrated to reality the usa is

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

seems like you already have your own bullshit answers to your own wacky conjectures.

it’s really quite simple, one candidate is an elderly man with some policy problems. the other guy is an elderly mentally deranged fascist who’s openly agitating for democracy’s end, he literally wants to be a dictator and brags about it.

HOW FUCKING THICK DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO SEE THIS AS A HARD DECISION?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Covering for all the actual winning?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I’m sorry you’re being downvoted for this comment. What you’re saying is absolutely true, the moderates just don’t want to hear it.

It’s the candidate’s job to assuage voter’s fears and convince people to vote for them. If Biden is too frail to do interviews, how is he going to do an election campaign? How is he even able to do this job? We have other people, why does it have to be Biden?

I liked how Jon Stewart put it - when the barbarians (Trump) are at the walls, you want Conan up there leading the charge, not a feeble old man who’s afraid to appear in front of the public.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

A lot of it is them not wanting to face reality and instead bury their head in the sand. Hoping it’ll just magically all work out. It’s kind of terrifying Biden is “the best we got” to go against Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Right. And they dismiss these really valid concerns as right wing propaganda or both-sides-isms. Polls right now show Trump polling marginally better than Biden. Shouldn’t this be sounding the alarms for more of us? Biden should be stomping Trump in polls but instead they’re neck and neck. And this is the guy that they’re determined to push.

I don’t even agree that Biden is “the best we got” but somehow everyone is convinced of that. I have a sad theory that DNC strategists see Biden as the most viable candidate because he’s a white male from a rust belt town. This profile lines up with many conservative voters that they think they need to win elections. This explains why they wouldn’t run someone “woke” like Whitmer or Newsome or maybe Michelle Obama. In other words, there aren’t any good ole boys left in the democratic party, or at least any popular enough to actually win (e.g., Joe Manchin).

From the perspective of an ordinary citizen though, Biden didn’t win because of conservative voters. He won because of a large coalition of different kinds of people - moderates, women, minority races, and leftists. Biden has upset that coalition by not pushing harder for codified reproductive rights, his stance on Gaza, and a weak relationship with labor. I worry that while moderates will turn out, that has never been enough to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 482K

    Comments