Amanda Zurawski told NBC News exclusively that she finds the prospect of Texas restricting in vitro fertilization “absolutely terrifying.”

A woman who is suing Texas after she said she nearly died when doctors delayed giving her a medically necessary abortion tells NBC News exclusively that she plans to move her frozen embryos out of the state for fear Texas could stop providing in vitro fertilization.

The move by Amanda Zurawski and her husband, Josh, follows news that at least three fertility clinics in Alabama have paused in vitro fertilization treatments following a ruling by the state Supreme Court that found embryos are people who have the same legal protections as children — and that people can be held liable for destroying them.

Zurawski, 36, said on Thursday that she and her husband signed papers to move their embryos out of the state because she fears Texas could follow Alabama’s lead and block her from starting the family she’s spent years trying to build.

“I don’t want them in a state where a similar ruling could very likely take place,” she said of her embryos. “Everything about IVF is very anxiety-inducing. It’s very scary. It’s very difficult and rulings like this one in Alabama are just adding another layer of fear and anxiety.”

73 points

In other news: woman arrested for smuggling children across state lines in a cooler. Charges include, child endangerment and lewd conduct as the cooler was not in an approved rear facing car seat nor were the test tubes properly clothed.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Legitimately what republicans want

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

So when do we get to start claiming embryos as dependents?

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Someone should just try it. And then when IRS says no, bring it to court so it can actually be brought to light. If embryos are children, how does it differ from an actual baby?

“The IRS defines a dependent as a qualifying child (under age 19 or under 24 if a full-time student, or any age if permanently and totally disabled) or a qualifying relative.”

If embryos are children, apparently there is no minimum age, just a maximum, so it would technically meet the requirements I would think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Can we keep a fresh batch of embryos and take the HOV lane? Im sure requirements will be to feed them and play music to keep them appeased during car trips

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If you’re looking for logical consistency you’re gonna have a bad time

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No but I am definitely looking for the logical extreme.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I was thinking more along the lines of “when do we start arranging in-person meetups for these cristo-fascists with their god”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Church?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They were subtly advocating murder unfortunately, though I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume they were being sarcastic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s the neat part. You don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Man I wish I could claim 5000 ova as dependants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Move them to alabama, well protect them!

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Toy manufacturers are gonna have to start setting age limits in the minuses at this rate. 🙃

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments