157 points
*

I’m sure the GOP will be happy to vote for this one in the house. They were perfectly fine with issuing much more for covid PPP loans and forgiving the loans completely. It’s so sad we have such a divided nation. We need to get rid of our first-past-the-post voting system, or it will be like this indefinitely.

permalink
report
reply
-42 points

Don’t suggest such an unworkable solution. People just need to vote. That’s the first step.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

It’s about systemic incentives, blindly hoping for a change in people’s behaviour is foolish at best. First past the post causes the same issues in every country it still exists today, it clear to see. That’s why most of Europe doesn’t use it, and hasn’t for a long time too. The US has an outdated democracy and we all wish you good luck in convincing others to update it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Most people still believe that the political process is working when there is zero signs to show that it is does. It is captured and voting for either side is legitimizing their regime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

If you live in a state that hasn’t joined yet, you can take action today!

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

With corporations owning politicians, an education crisis, a housing crisis, and the entire country hating eachother it doesn’t matter what voting system you tack on. We need some sort of reboot as a country on many levels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

It’s called a civil war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Except only one side is really fighting. It’s more like civil domination, or a civil coup.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

How about peacefully Balkanizing the continent and letting each geocultural region govern themselves? New England, the South, Appalachia, Pacific Northwest, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Unfortunately the last civil war we had only made things exponentially worse, especially for POCs. And it changed nothing in terms of how the government was run.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah but nuking the filibuster, if that’s what you’re referring to, would actually be a horrible idea.

If Democrats are a majority, then they will pass anything unopposed, which would be great. Means progress and getting shit done.

But if we end up with Republican majority, we’re going to be in a world of shit, very fast because they’d get the same benefits.

Voting matters. Vote trash out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Next comes the languishing phase, followed by the ineffectual defense, capped off with a bipartisan veto.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

They’ll wait until after the election to veto it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

“Both sides” at its finest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

While 49 R senators and 1 D senator for 50 total is technically bipartisan, it’s incredibly misleading to call it that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
0 points

Nope it’s pretty much just Manchin

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Please let this pass and kick in after I get my grad school loans… haha.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

While this sounds good, it’s never going to pass. The rich make too much money from the interest.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

So does the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-38 points

So why would anyone ever pay it back?

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Well, you could do interest free with penalties for not making minimum payments.

But also, effectively canceling student loans may be the whole point

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

To improve their credit score.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Want to buy a house? Or make most major life financial decisions involving loans? You’ll pay it off to the best of your ability. Even if your student loan payment is a couple hundred bucks a month, lenders look at the entire principal and weight it heavily against you—even with 7 years of perfect payments.

But the real question you should ask is: why do we want normal people to pay these particular loans back when it is a fact that the government crafts policies to force people into higher education in order to secure our economy? For all the bluster with Gen Z somewhat dodging degrees, the fact remains that higher education remains a requirement for the future strength of all of us.

It should be gratis just like primary education is. It’s a public good. Cut the cost of getting these degrees and suddenly you don’t have people requiring incredibly high salaries in order to just pay the interest.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments