2 points

Release builds of simple-raytracer are now benchmarked too. Release builds are slower but should still be faster than the LLVM backend.

Is the “faster, slower” here referring to compile times?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Yes, as far as I’m aware this is only focusing on compile times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It has been quite a while since the last progress report. A ton of progress has been made since then, but I simply didn’t get around writing a new progress report. There have been 639 commits since the last progress report. This is significantly more than the last time given how long there has been since the last progress report.

Is this rap?
Some work needs to be done on the flow.
Nice bars though.

Release builds are slower but should still be faster than the LLVM backend.

Had us in the second half.

the resulting executables are about 20% faster and for simple-raytracer faster than LLVM in debug mode.

Had us in the first half.

core::simd is fully supported through emulation

Had us in the first half again.

There are still things to be done though. [link] lists things I know of that still need to be done.

You see that “though”… you thinkin’… the rhythm… I’ve broken it!
Accidentally repetitive?.. or maybe I’m just… unrollin’ it!

You go be busy… with them sanitizers… and tracebacks
I’ll just be here chilin’… and puttin’ Rust on them maps


No but seriously, great work.

And yes, I know that was lame/cringe.

permalink
report
reply

Rust

!rust@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits
  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

Community stats

  • 504

    Monthly active users

  • 890

    Posts

  • 3.9K

    Comments