Biden appeared almost 10 years to the day after he was a guest on the first “Late Night” show with Meyers when he was vice president in 2014.

President Joe Biden made an appearance Monday on “Late Night with Seth Meyers,” where he answered questions about topics ranging from his age and the Israel-Hamas war to the conservative conspiracy about Taylor Swift.

The interview comes almost 10 years to the day after Biden was a guest on the first “Late Night” show with Meyers, which aired on Feb. 24, 2014, when Biden was vice president. It also follows a decision this month to skip a Super Bowl interview that had a much larger audience.

During Monday’s Q&A, Biden was asked early on how he addresses voter concern over his age.

“Take a look at the other guy, he’s about as old as I am," said Biden, who at 81 is four years older than former President Donald Trump.

It’s about how old your ideas are. Look, I mean, this is a guy who wants to take us back,” Biden added, pointing to Trump’s positions on abortion rights, which he suggested were outdated.

4 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


President Joe Biden made an appearance Monday on “Late Night with Seth Meyers,” where he answered questions about topics ranging from his age and the Israel-Hamas war to the conservative conspiracy about Taylor Swift.

During Monday’s Q&A, Biden was asked early on how he addresses voter concern over his age.

Look, I mean, this is a guy who wants to take us back," Biden added, pointing to Trump’s positions on abortion rights, which he suggested were outdated.

Pressed by Meyers about calls for an immediate cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war, Biden said, “There is a path forward, with difficulty,” and he commented on the ongoing hostage situation.

Biden made a similar remark before the interview aired, telling reporters in New York, “My hope is by next Monday we will have a cease-fire."

In a more lighthearted exchange, Meyers asked Biden about whether he was involved in an “active conspiracy” with Swift after a conspiracy theory on that right claimed the pop star’s relationship with Kansas City Chiefs player Travis Kelce was manufactured to boost Democrats in the 2024 elections.


The original article contains 399 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Do you have link to the full interview?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Don’t think they’ve released it to stream yet, they usually post to YouTube some time the following day

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thx

permalink
report
parent
reply
-109 points
*

“It’s about how old your ideas are. Look, I mean, this is a guy who wants to take us back,” Biden added, pointing to Trump’s positions on abortion rights, which he suggested were outdated.

Biden saying this is a joke

He is Catholic and Roe versus Wade happened on Biden’s watch

Did not even try an executive order or anything

His ideas are old as well just look at his other policies such as his and prosecutor Kamala’s outdated cannabis stance

permalink
report
reply
41 points

He’s done quite a few executive orders and/or implemented policies easing access to abortion. As federal EOs though, they only concern the federal government’s treatment of abortion and do not affect state law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Did anything happen with his safe harbor initiative? I admit i haven’t looked into it since biden spoke on it after roe fell

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points

They dont like what youre sayin. Neither do i, truth be told. but it is the truth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

It’s not, though. They’re basically saying Biden should reinstate Roe via executive order, which a president cannot do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

roe vs wade was a wide reaching decision on privacy, biden could absolutely enact executive orders that ensure women have necessary access to healthcare nation wide while they shake out a more permanent solution legislatively

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points
*

Please don’t speak for others. Bidens personal feelings on abortion and his voting record on it is well documented. Have a look, then you tell me if you think his historical record on abortion tells you about what he might do going forward.

Like, don’t listen to platitudes, lookit what he does when the chips are down. Just like you would evaluate any other human being

EDIT: fixed broken link, apologies

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Yeah, he absolutely should have replaced the supreme Court judges trump placed that made the ruling! Or at least he should have ordered them to rule differently by executive order!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-41 points

Maybe he should have pushed for something to happen when he happen to be VP during a super majority 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Maybe he should’ve. It looked like a settled issue at that point with the duration of precedent. It might have been better if he did, during the brief window that supermajority existed, but that doesn’t mean it happened on his watch. Those judges were put in office when he was out of office and could do nothing, and when the ruling happened it was entirely out of his hands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

Why didn’t he, as VP, push to legalize something that was already legal and viewed as settled law when the president was focused on the ACA during the, what was it, like 2 weeks they had a super majority?

Come on man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

The state of our education is really sad that you failed civics so hard. No executive order can reverse R.v.W. This has to be a troll or a child.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

why?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order

Large policy changes with wide-ranging effects have been implemented by executive order, including the racial integration of the armed forces under President Truman.

Two extreme examples of an executive order are Franklin Roosevelt’s Executive Order 6102 “forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States”, and Executive Order 9066, which delegated military authority to remove any or all people in a military zone (used to target Japanese Americans, non-citizen Germans, and non-citizen Italians in certain regions). The order was then delegated to General John L. DeWitt, and it subsequently paved the way for all Japanese-Americans on the West Coast to be sent to internment camps for the duration of World War II.

President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13233 in 2001, which restricted public access to the papers of former presidents. The order was criticized by the Society of American Archivists and other groups, who say it “violates both the spirit and letter of existing U.S. law on access to presidential papers as clearly laid down in 44 USC 2201–07”, and adding that the order “potentially threatens to undermine one of the very foundations of our nation”. President Barack Obama subsequently revoked Executive Order 13233 in January 2009.[19]

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Show us how an executive order can reverse a supreme court decision. None of these examples have anything to do w what is being asked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Aww. Seth put on a suit for Biden.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

It was the 10th anniversary of the show

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Did Biden jump out of a cake?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Happy anniversary Mr late night

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Where my jackals at?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Here, anxiously awaiting for Friday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s Mac Tonight night

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Just enjoying my negroni.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Can’t wait to see if the negroni encased in a giant fake ice cube was the climax of that bit or if there’s something even more delightfully unhinged waiting for us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yoooooo

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Drinking from my jackel mug right now!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 472K

    Comments