In California, a high school teacher complains that students watch Netflix on their phones during class. In Maryland, a chemistry teacher says students use gambling apps to place bets during the school day.

Around the country, educators say students routinely send Snapchat messages in class, listen to music and shop online, among countless other examples of how smartphones distract from teaching and learning.

The hold that phones have on adolescents in America today is well-documented, but teachers say parents are often not aware to what extent students use them inside the classroom. And increasingly, educators and experts are speaking with one voice on the question of how to handle it: Ban phones during classes.

15 points
*

On the other hand, this is how we know about teachers doing things they absolutely shouldn’t do.

I read books in class. I drew pictures in class. I just looked out the window and daydreamed. Kids aren’t going to pay attention just because you take away their phones.

EDIT: I’m honestly amazed people are against that. Are you not aware that this is why we have videos like this that expose racist teachers?

https://abc7.com/fontana-sequoia-middle-school-teacher-racial-slur/13092208/

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Exactly. If a student doesn’t want to pay attention, it won’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I think the exposing teachers part is even more important. I edited my post to show a link to a student who filmed a teacher being racist above.

Here’s another link to another incident to show that isn’t a one-off

https://www.kansascity.com/news/state/missouri/article275311416.html

I got all kinds of mistreatment by teachers in school and saw even worse stuff happen to other kids. Racism, sexual harassment, violent threats, etc. But we didn’t have phones with cameras in them back in the early 90s, so they got away with it. They can’t anymore… unless they ban phones, of course.

EDIT: I don’t suppose one of the many downvoters would take the time to explain why giving children the ability to expose teachers like this should be taken away from them in the name of getting kids to pay attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

EDIT: I don’t suppose one of the many downvoters would take the time to explain why giving children the ability to expose teachers like this should be taken away from them in the name of getting kids to pay attention.

To give you a genuine response, it is at least conceivable that the potential harm caused by allowing students with adolescent brains constant access to platforms that are explicitly and intentionally designed to be as addictive and distracting as possible is greater than the positive impact of outing the occasional bigoted teacher.

I’m not saying this is definitively the case because I’m neither a sociologist nor a psychologist, but I think it’s fair to say that we can objectively state that this is at least possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Teachers can be shit without being racists: https://youtu.be/ha8RN1iWrug

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

That doesn’t mean we need to enable it with devices providing things like Instagram, Tiktok, and games that are designed to sap your attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
7 points

Wow, that math one! They did the same thing in my kid’s math class! It was during Covid, so the teacher recorded it himself without a second thought! I couldn’t believe what I was seeing!

I hear what you’re saying about recording. But Im not sure phones in class are the answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I don’t know what other answer there is to stop teachers getting away with this shit. The racism and sexual harassment I saw on display when I was going to school in Indiana in the 80s and 90s was not a secret. But since it was always the teacher’s word against the kid’s, the teacher always got away with it. The only time I can think of that it didn’t happen was when a very devoted girl and her family in my high school spent a lot of time and money in court suing a teacher who sexually harassed her in middle school. He had his job the whole time (he was finally fired when he lost the case).

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

I may be a creaking ancient, but is the policy not “get in trouble if your phone is seen in class, or even taken away”?

permalink
report
reply
48 points

It used to be, but nowadays it seems that students don’t really give a shit. They’ll downright just refuse to do what a teacher/other figure of authority will ask/tell them to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Yeah, so problem isn’t phones. Problem is that teachers don’t have enough authority. If teachers cannot take away the phone, then just toss them out.

I feel like this “ban phones” is getting common but it does not fix the actual problem of teachers not being able to keep discipline in class.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Can’t they just be asked to leave class if they refuse to cooperate or have some other kind of sanction imposed such as a complaint to the parents or a deduction in the grade?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The problem is parents arguing that they want their kids to have them at all times. Then they call and text their kids all day during school. I even had a football coach call one of my students during class.

The culture of instant communication at all times is really killing our kids’ education. Parents just need to back the fuck off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

What good does that do when the parents go pick it up that day and give it to the kid? It’s the parents not following through with the punishment and cutting the authority of the school off at the knees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It used to be, but then the parents get involved and have a hissy fit. They say f it, I don’t get paid enough for this extra stress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If you do that as a teacher, not only will you be getting pushback from that student and others, but also said student’s parents.

When I was a kid, you respected teachers and if you didn’t, you got punished at school AND at home. These days parents are rude assholes too, and god forbid you try and correct their precious snowflake’s shitty behaviour.

And bans only really work if the school management has your back and make it a schoolwide ban. Otherwise it’s simply not worth the fight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“When you were a kid…” No they fucking did not. Some kids have always been little shits and some “parents” only qualifications were functional gonads. It’s always been that way and always will.

Your memory is fading so you don’t remember.

https://news.ucsb.edu/2019/019669/kids-these-days

Just like many other distractions before them, phones take kids attention away from school activities. Kids have always looked to avoid classwork. Pre-cell phones, teachers were collecting comic books, different popular toys, friendship bracelets etc… it’s just the lastest issue on constant battle: Teachers try to get kids to learn, kids do everything they can to avoid it.

Most schools around here have implemented a no phone policy during class. If the phone is out, it’s sent to the office for them to collect at the end of the day.

Because of this policy, in my kids middle school some very talented kids are creatively bypassing school controls on their Chromebooks to play games. It’s an ongoing battle between a loosely organized group of 50 kids and the schools IT department. By my count the IT has squashed 9 different versions each more sophisticated than the last. The kids are hands down winning right now with a truly elegant and devious solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

If you don’t remember the fact that kids were more respectful 25 years ago or so, you’re probably less than 25 years old. The shit teachers deal with today simply did not happen back then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

While I agree students shouldn’t be distracted with their phones during class I don’t think enacting a law is the best remedy for the malady. This aught to be resolved by school district or even just a classroom policy.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

The issue with local policy like that is that school boards or individual teachers are hugely susceptible to parental rage. Countless teachers will talk about how every parent has some reason why little Timmy just absolutely must have his TikTok machine on him at all times, just in case his mom needs to text him and can’t be bothered to call the school office.

Having some state-level precedent makes this much easier for local officials, who can just say that they’re following state guidelines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

That’s a fair point. But what’s worse for a student, not paying attention in class or getting a cop sent into the classroom to arrest/assault them?

If it’s a law, and the school has a cop on premises it’s just a question of when will a teacher ask a cop to deal with it.

I am not sure if a law enforced by the government and courtrooms without much room for exception is the best idea. What if a student genuinely needs a phone in class?

Why couldn’t the precedent be a school policy similar to how some schools might have a uniform policy? Why would it be easier to enforce a uniform policy than a no phone policy?

Also, what is the difference between a highschool and a college interms of phone use during class?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

To be very clear, I was not suggesting that a cop arrest a student for opening Instagram.

My point is that schools will be significantly more able to resist parental pressure when the school boards quite literally do not have the authority to make the decision. Perhaps there is some room for exceptions with legitimate need, but I’d argue that the bar needs to be pretty high for that, because again, it was in fact possible for students to attend school without phones for essentially all of human history. If a parent really needs to get a message to a student, they can call the office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

has some reason why little Timmy just absolutely must have his TikTok machine on him at all times, just in case his mom needs to text him and can’t be bothered to call the school office

And that’s a problem why exactly? Why is every comment here pretending that there is either being glued to the screen of your phone or having it locked away, no inbetween?

Schools can somehow enforce completely rediculous clothign regulations but “the phone stays in your bag unless it’s an emergency” is somehow impossible because it’s some kind of law of nature that you must stare at the screen 24/7.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Do you want to have to watch your 25+ students every minute to enforce your rule, or would you like to teach your lesson?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I don’t have kids, and when I was in school no one had phones, so I’m way out of the loop, but there were various electronic devices that could be a distraction. Portable music players, handheld games, even a graphing calculator in a non-math or science class, any one of these would have been confiscated if used during class.

I can not think of a single reason a student should have access to a phone during class that can’t be solved another way.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

We used to sneak Tiger electronic handheld games into class. Just put it in your lap and pretend you were reading the textbook.

I mean yeah, we got caught sometimes. But not often enough to stop doing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I don’t think the issue is that teachers don’t want to take away the distractions, it’s more that they aren’t given the needed authority any more.

Students have notably less respect for their teachers and will often simply refuse to obey, and physically forcing them is obviously out of the question. Not to mention the absolute shitstorm that breaks over any teacher when one of the students complains at home and so invokes the fury of a helicopter parent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The scourge in my grade school was Rubik’s Cubes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

would have been stolen*

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

What I actually like about phones in classrooms is a transparency. Every fuck up like teacher being rude or kids picking fights with each other would be recorded from a couple of angles. 20-30 teens collected together in a small room and feel bored is a recipe for something to happen, especially when teacher is that bad at getting their attention. That’s a highlighted reason why the same law was introduced in my country - to defend teachers from responsibility while they are to indocrinate youth with things even kids don’t find believable and use force if necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you are into surveillance wouldn’t it be easier to just install cameras everywhere and record everything? Then phone can stay away and locked.

To be clear, I’m not advocating for this, it sounds like a 1984 nightmare. It’s just that you don’t need kids with phones to enact surveillance

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It matters who have that survelliance capability. With phones all parties are equal to report problems, with cameras - it’s school, and it’s not that hard to imagine them losing data when they themselves are at risk of a lawsuit. Besides, mass surveiliance via cameras would rightfully meet a pushback (and it’s an overkill) while phones are already here and already fixated tons of problems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

If you are into surveillance wouldn’t it be easier to just install cameras everywhere and record everything? Then phone can stay away and locked.

Never works in kids’ favor. Catch teacher lying or yelling? Never.

If you wondering that country is Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

As someone with severe ADHD, if I don’t have something to listen to(through headphones obviously) or to mess with in my hands, I can pay attention to about 3 words before I am completely distracted with how the ceiling tiling looks. I get that a lot of students simply don’t pay attention as a result of their phone, but for some of us, it’s the only reason we can pay attention.

Not to mention, ebooks are a thing, and when you’re pirating them you don’t have to worry about overdue fees or your book getting stolen/damaged.

Final point, a lot of my teachers were dogshit, so learning from Wikipedia and other sources was vastly more entertaining and informative than listening to them try to explain addition to that dumbass in the back for the 8th time when he can’t even read

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Also any kind of emergency can happen while a kid is at school, the obvious one for the americans is an active shooter but it could be anything even an earth quake or other disaster where it all of a sudden becomes very important for each student to have their own line of communication available.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Phone safe on the wall. If there’s a good reason you can always access your phone, but you don’t have it in your hands while in class.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

People always say this, but somehow society and schools did manage to function before 2008.

We know that access to phones causes significantly worse student performance. Is it really worth harming all students’ ability to learn just so that, in the event of a rare emergency, a family can get an “all good” message a little bit faster? Schools were perfectly able to locate and track their students during emergencies and notify families before smartphones existed, speaking as someone who was in an extreme weather emergency during school myself during that time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, I feel like the only way it would be useful is in the very unlikely event you somehow get cut off from everyone else. Parents likely can’t do anything useful until the emergency is over anyway and I don’t know who else you would call that the school wouldn’t already have called.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Why 2008? Why arbitrary year?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You don’t have to lock it up right away. In Germany, at least the school I went to, we’re allowed to have them on us, they have to stay in the pocket or bag and should at least be in do not disturb or silent mode. Otherwise, only then teachers take it away and you have to retrieve it from the admin office when you leave. (It’s more relaxed too in the last two years when you’re around 18, I’m pretty sure in a lot of classes I just had it on the desk when teachers didn’t mind. It still had to not cause distractions though.)

Generally this worked well (though, I left our equivalent of high school in 2019, no idea how it is now), except in some classes with oblivious teachers. But I feel like in those cases, you can make all the laws you want and it won’t fix shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

In Germany, at least the school I went to, we’re allowed to have them on us, they have to stay in the pocket or bag and should at least be in do not disturb or silent mode.

It’s a perfectly reasonable policy that many, if not most, US Schools either had or still have. The problem is that Students are increasingly refusing to comply with Social Order rules like this and Teachers increasingly don’t have the authority or ability to enforce them when they’re broken. The policy only works when the majority of people willingly comply, just like nearly all of the other rules / policies / laws that society creates.

So what does a Teacher do when 15 of their 20 students have their phones out and are using them in class?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Teachers increasingly don’t have the authority or ability to enforce them when they’re broken.

Well, I feel like this is the main problem then. If teachers aren’t allowed to enforce any rules, what are we even talking about here. Especially kids will do anything they can get away with. (I certainly did my fair share of shenanigans too.)

The policy only works when the majority of people willingly comply, just like nearly all of the other rules / policies / laws that society creates.

So what does a Teacher do when 15 of their 20 students have their phones out and are using them in class?

Really? I think this is very different since it’s in a controlled environment with a relatively small group of people. Or at least, it should be. The teacher should very reasonably be able to take all of those away. And if not, here they certainly had the ability to escalate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What would a phone do in the case of a school shooter or earthquake exactly? During a school shooting, kids are advised to be as quiet as possible. An earthquake isn’t something a phone call can solve. You don’t need phones in classrooms.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 522K

    Comments