5 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Biden administration has announced a $1.7 billion package to fund initiatives aimed at ending hunger across the U.S. by 2030, the White House announced on Tuesday morning.

The commitment will go towards funding 141 projects across the nation.

The full details of the package are expected to be announced by Doug Emhoff, the husband of Vice President Kamala Harris, at an event at the White House later on Tuesday.

As of 2022, around 17 million households experienced food insecurity nationwide, and more than 44 million people across the U.S. faced hunger, including one in five children, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The funding builds on the $8 billion already committed to fighting hunger in September 2022.

This is a breaking story.


The original article contains 127 words, the summary contains 124 words. Saved 2%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Noble cause but they already spent 8 billion 2 years ago and there is plenty of hunger. I’m not sure how another 1.7 billion will fix it.

There is plenty of food but the distribution is a big part of the problem, hopefully they are addressing that.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

I mean, his admin is ALSO currently trying to block the Kroger/Albertsons merger, for example. So this is clearly not the only thing going on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Completely different group within his admin. FTC isnt gonna have a hand in ending hunger

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The FTC price increases in foods due to monopolizing is absolutely having a hand in helping to reduce hunger.

Another thing I can think of off the top of my head the Biden admin and democrats are doing is fighting to increase funding for SNAP and resisting republican efforts to impose more restrictions on the program and make it harder to use.

Also the 8 billion isn’t already spent and nothing happened, it’s in the process of being spent and this is more being put on top.

While these are all fine and good, personally I still think a universal basic income would be the best way at reducing hunger. A totally unrestricted program like that though be very hard to push, despite all the evidence of their effectiveness, when there’s fighting over whether or not SNAP should be taking a fine toothed comb to exactly what foods people are or not allowed to buy with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The government spends hundreds of billions on infrastructure every year.

Have we fixed potholes permanently?

Also, $8 billion is a bit less than $24 bucks per person in America. Do you really think $24 is enough to permanently solve hunger in a country? Do you think that another $5/person is reasonable, a few years later?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, we aren’t all go hungry, obviously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points

Waste of money; fight the high prices instead of this pr crap

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Man I hate when politicians try to help people

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

This will help for what, a year or two?

He could spend his time and effort trying to fix the issue long term . . . or at the very least address thee root cause (capitalism) and donate the money for a temporary fix.

The funding builds on the $8 billion already committed to fighting hunger in September 2022.

And yet lack of access to food and hunger is still growing, almost like throwing money at the problem won’t ever fix it and all it takes is one Republican government to come along and stop throwing money at it for this house of cards to come crashing down on the most needing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

How do you know that’s not part of the plan?

Also, the president can’t address the “root cause” or “capitalism”, that’s the domain of Congress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

You don’t understand the root issue it seems

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just tell me the root issue is capitalism and that it’s the root of all evil so we can move on

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

How does one “fight high grocery prices” exactly? You can’t legislate lower margins for companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

… Of course we can. Why couldn’t we?

There’s also all sorts of laws that aren’t being enforced, but should be. Such as anti trust laws, which could be used to split almost every company at the grocery store, as well as most grocery stores themselves

There’s probably laws still on the books related to price gouging for basic food specifically too

Our country wasn’t always like this

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

Too bad many states will just refuse the money.

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

It’s the best they can do given the political landscape IMO

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That’s probably the reason he is pledging it. It will help democrats in those states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t get this part…

The full details of the package are expected to be announced by Doug Emhoff, the husband of Vice President Kamala Harris, at an event at the White House later on Tuesday.

Why?! Biden should be doing this! He needs to be out in public looking strong and “doing things”! SMH This makes him look like everybody else is doing his job for him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

… who the fuck cares?

Why doesn’t Biden personally shove his boot up my ass? Him making my boss do it shows how weak he is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or like at least Harris. She could sure use a win at some point during this presidency. She’s done plenty of work shoveling shit, give her at least one video clip of doing something good. No one’s going to put Doug Emhoff on the news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

My god that picture.

“What’re you looking at smooth skin”

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 412K

    Comments