Gyrados, as well all know, is actually a Water/Flying type. This was done because Dragon was not a type in the game when Gyrados was introduced.

Should this be fixed on have his type changed to what he was based on? A Chinese Water Dragon?

13 points

Isn’t the Dratini line dragon type in Gen 1? The same games that Gyarados was introduced.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Yes, OP is wrong. Dragon type existed in Gen 1 and was wildly overpowered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah and the Dratini line was the only dragon type in gen 1 and was supposed to be very powerful and psudo-legendary.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they decided against giving Gyarados the dragon type because of that specific lore reason as it’s never made a whole lot of sense to me that it had the flying type either. I think Gyarados would be too strong both offensively and defensively if it didn’t have the quad elec weakness which is probably why it’s the way it is. (Disclaimer: I know nothing of Pokemon beyond gen4 and feel free to disregard my opinions)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Pokémon

!pokemon@lemmy.ml

Create post

The Lemmy community for all things Pokémon!

Rules:

    1. Be a decent human being.
    1. Fanart must be credited.
    1. No untagged spoilers of new games, anime episodes, etc.

Community stats

  • 206

    Monthly active users

  • 305

    Posts

  • 1.2K

    Comments