And got a straightforward no as a response XD

Kbin link

25 points

What does it mean to discuss free and open software off the record?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Only correct response to Meta.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I can see Meta going ahead with their plan, and everyone blocking them. They will then start bad-mouthing the Fediverse because it’s never their fault.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I mean… realistically, why would that be their fault if they were to start a fedi instance and everyone else blocked them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Because of their historical track record?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well if everyone defederated the message would be clear: Meta is unwelcome here. Their following press releases would probably spin a very different narrative about immature tech and privacy concerns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Their following press releases would probably spin a very different narrative about immature tech and privacy concerns.

What else do you expect them to do? Say “oh yeah I guess a bunch of guys on fedi say we are arseholes, so we must be”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Badass response, thanks for sharing

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Not sure if turning down an invitation to discuss is a good thing. You can always say no to the proposals after you have listened to them. Participate in discussions, but don’t co-operate with them.

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

There’s zero chance anything good would come out of this meeting anyway, and they wouldn’t be able to talk about it due to NDAs, so why bother?

Meta chose to make it a closed meeting, not the dev.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Perhaps the problem was that it was not an open discussion, but an “off-the-records”, private one. And, from a moral standpoint, small concessions can end up leading to a slippery slope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

@CorInABox
No perhaps. That was all the problem. It was a break of trust by the admins who attended this meeting, and then cannot do a lot to regain the trust since they cannot speak about the subject. Eben is unknown who attended meeting.
@LollerCorleone @kaladininskyrim

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I don’t have a problem with admins having discussions with Meta. I have a problem with those discussions being off the record or under NDA. We thrive on transparency. The secrecy is the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I understand your point and was inclined to agree, up until it said off the record and confidential. Ohhhhhh, so THEIR privacy is important? They can kindly kick rocks and figure it out themselves, especially for free.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse

!fediverse@kbin.social

Create post

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

Community stats

  • 3

    Monthly active users

  • 680

    Posts

  • 3.9K

    Comments

Community moderators