Hey all! I’m wondering if someone can help me pick between these two apps. They seem to be the most commonly recommended Android front-ends for OpenStreetMaps, but I’m wondering what the pros/cons/differences are. Thanks in advance!

4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

(I haven’t used osmand in a minute)

Osmand has a buttload of features but the UI is kinda complicated, whereas OrganicMaps has a simple UI but less features.

If you want car navigation I’d recommend MagicEarth because it has traffic info

permalink
report
reply
13 points
8 points

Proprietary is not some evil demon. Sure open source is better, but it’s just one bullet point in a pro/con table.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Deal breaker for people who care about Free software

permalink
report
parent
reply

It kind is, though. Proprietary doesn’t mean paid; I’ll pay for OSS apps. Proprietary means they won’t release the source code, and this is bad for a whole bunch of reasons. But the reason that gets my goat is that it’s almost guaranteed that proprietary app was developed with open source tools, and probably uses at least some open source code. I fucking hate hypocrites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

For some people, not getting stuck in traffic is worth using proprietary software.

Are there any FOSS navigation apps with (paid?) traffic info?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For traffic info, I would use Google maps. For other map related data, OSMand / Organic Maps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Thanks, that’s a nice and concise summary!

Where does MagicEarth get its traffic data from? Also is it FOSS? I couldn’t find much about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Some of it is user reported. I think they have a 3rd party provider as well but I’m not 100% certain on that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

OSMand is a much more powerful tool even with no plugins and it’s a mature app you can count on.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

On the other hand Organic Maps has less features, which means a much simpler interface and much better performance

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Performance of OSMand is actually great on mid-level SOCs I usually get. Anything with snapdragon 6xx or more and performance is a non-issue for me, especially since it has a new opengl2 renderer. Also, it uses very, very little battery navigating me with voice (so screen off) along a pre-defined GPX on locally downloaded maps in airplane mode. And the simplicity of the interface is a downside once you spend a few hours tinkering with OSMand and get used to all it can do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ll go ahead and throw another option out there. Magic Earth. I would use OsmAnd or Organic Maps more often but neither support routing with public transport other than the train.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Also a great option, but closed source

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I thinl they are intended for very different kind of users and use cases: Organic Maps is a simple and traightforward navigtaion app. It does not do much, but does it very well. OsmAnd is a feature-rich app for power users who want to tinker and customize.

I have both on my phone :)

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 9.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.6K

    Posts

  • 308K

    Comments