In a study published in June in Environmental Science & Technology, Hussain and his colleagues reported that, when microwaved, these containers released millions of bits of plastic, called microplastics, and even tinier nanoplastics.

[…]

Once they’ve snuck past the body’s defense systems, “the chemicals used in plastics hack hormones,” says Leonardo Trasand, a professor at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine and the director of the Center for the Investigation of Environmental Hazards. Hormones are signaling molecules underlying basically everything the body does, so these chemicals, called endocrine disruptors, have the potential to mess with everything from metabolismto sexual development and fertility.

[…]

Judith Enck, a former EPA regional administrator and the president of Beyond Plastics, a policy and advocacy group against plastic pollution, stopped microwaving plastic 30 years ago. She thinks that you should, too: “My goodness, especially if you have kids or if you’re pregnant, do not put plastic in the microwave.”

“It’s a pain in the neck,” she acknowledges, but “even this one study should be a wake-up call—not just to new parents but to the FDA. They need to be far more proactive.” Transand agrees: “The FDA is glacially behind.”

[…]

“I don’t believe that there are microwave-safe plastics.” Trasand and Enck agree that while independent studies should continue testing how much plastic is being released from food packaging, there is already enough evidence to show that “microwave-safe plastic” isn’t really safe. “I think the FDA needs to tell companies that they can no longer say any plastic is microwavable,” says Enck.

3 points

More wired clickbait bs. It boils down to “don’t microwave plastics that aren’t microwave safe” What a fucking revelation

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*

Here’s the academic study published this year.

If you don’t have academic credentials to log in (and I suspect you don’t), LPT you can email or tweet the study’s authors and they’ll happily send you access for free.

e: a key takeaway: ‘Furthermore, an in vitro study conducted to assess the cell viability showed that the extracted microplastics and nanoplastics released from the plastic container can cause the death of 76.70 and 77.18% of human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T) at 1000 μg/mL concentration after exposure of 48 and 72 h, respectively.’

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Just to add more emphasis, they’ll happily send it because they often just as (if not significantly more) pissed at the systems in place to keep academic papers out of public circulation so corporations can pocket the money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I don’t believe that there are microwave-safe plastics

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It boils down to “don’t microwave plastics that aren’t microwave safe” What a fucking revelation

The main plastic the article calls into question is polypropylene. I’ve got bad news for you. Its used frequently in microwavable food products and sold as “microwave safe”. Polypropylene is recycle symbol #5.

Here’s a perfect example. That cup of rice is #5 plastic, polypropylene. You can see the package says right on it “Microwave for one minute”. This isn’t the only product I’ve seen with a polypropylene container. Here’s another one for BBQ pulled porkyou can even see on the package itself in the bottom right hand corner at the recycling symbol it says its polypropylene. And if you look at the preparation instructions it gives microwave directions.

I can’t speak to the science in the article, but it certainly is talking about a plastic that consumers are regularly told is safe to microwave.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

@thorbot definitely didn’t read the article

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

That’s literally NOT what it’s saying? They literally are saying, verbatim, that they don’t think ANY plastic we know of is microwave safe. Are you dumb or intentionally trying to mislead people?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I hate Wired as much as the next Zippie, but they’re just passing on the info here. And what plastics are microwave safe?

Boland disagrees: “I don’t believe that there are microwave-safe plastics.” Trasand and Enck agree that while independent studies should continue testing how much plastic is being released from food packaging, there is already enough evidence to show that “microwave-safe plastic” isn’t really safe. “I think the FDA needs to tell companies that they can no longer say any plastic is microwavable,” says Enck.

That’s right, Bubba. Doughnut. Goose-egg. Nada

permalink
report
parent
reply

Y’all are microwaving plastic??

permalink
report
reply
34 points
*

while i am a bit sceptic of the value of this article, no i dont. I have never in my life put plastic in the microwave and never in my life did i think that this would be a good idea. Not because of conviction or anything but because i developed a fight and flight reaction towards heating plastic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There are tons of foods packaged in plastic that are (according to the directions) meant to be microwaved, never mind people heating up leftovers in takeout containers or whatever. It’s super common. And even if you never do it yourself, I can almost guarantee that your favourite restaurant does so you’re still consuming foods microwaved in plastic one way or another.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Shit, I just had steam in bag brussel sprouts the other day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@JustAManOnAToilet @usualsuspect191

I stopped 30+ years ago after microwaving chili and it melted the side of the plastic container.

Fyi there’s been stories about this for years (usually having to do with chemical contamination from the plastic) but the FDA never seemed to look into it.

Imo that’s because Big Oil didn’t want them to, because it would not only remove a HUGE source of their revenue but would also open them up to massive lawsuits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes. People. Stahp.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Some people have cheap plates

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I’m literally doing it as we speak. :(

e: I’ve been buying Steamables because I’m disabled and can’t easily cook. For those who don’t know, it’s basically a meal in a plastic bag, that you microwave for six minutes, and apparently the literal worst thing you can do.

Now I think of it, as a disabled and poor person, I’m struggling to think of a meal I can make that isn’t riddled with plastics. I guess we’re doomed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Huel or Soylent isn’t too expensive (if you get the powder) and I’d say it tastes reasonable. Huel especially has some great ingredients in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you have friends who could bring you meals? I always make too much, and would happily do this

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No, but honestly at 54, I’m probably 87% microplastics at this point anyhow lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So, microwave on paper plates. Got it.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Microwaving plastic releases microplastics and nanoplastics that some researchers consider harmful.

Saved you a click.

permalink
report
reply
64 points

I’m sorry :(

permalink
report
reply
2 points

🥇

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Oh you rascal, you know we can’t stay mad at you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Chef Mike!

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 522K

    Comments